Do some sites of the civilisation suggest that human civilisation was even more advanced prior to Indus Valley civilisation. Carbon dating alone is not sufficient to reveal the
real duration of a civilisation.
http://www.mohenjodaro.net/index.html
2007-02-20
17:21:23
·
7 answers
·
asked by
echaris
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History
The designs, and methods used in Indus valley civilisation are still in use in India. It seems that this civilisation is part of present civilisation. The later generations seems to have made very little contribution to the life styles except increased numbers of foolish wars and examples of notorious deeds.
2007-02-20
19:46:07 ·
update #1
Beginning and end of any civilisation may probably not be known simply by some chemical or physical testings. All that intended was to highlight the fact that methods, practices, archtecture styles, bricks and most of the other things till recently are not only similiar but also same to that existed during Indus civilisation. Indus civilisation was not invaded and destroyed by anyone as it still survive in towns and villages. Foreign historians and researchers can never realise it and may be misled by their own techniques and methods. And foolish wars destroyed beautiful settlements just like march of herds of starved animals on beautiful floral lands. It is how Satyug came to an end to give way to unethical, selfish and sinful era of Kaliyuga.
2007-02-22
19:26:07 ·
update #2
Beginning and end of any civilisation may probably not be known simply by some chemical or physical testings. All that intended was to highlight the fact that methods, practices, archtecture styles, bricks and most of the other things till recently are not only similiar but also same to that existed during Indus civilisation. Indus civilisation was not invaded and destroyed by anyone as it still survive in towns and villages. Foreign historians and researchers can never realise it and may be misled by their own techniques and methods. And foolish wars destroyed beautiful settlements just like march of herds of starved animals on beautiful floral lands. It is how Satyug came to an end to give way to unethical, selfish and sinful era of Kaliyuga.
2007-02-22
19:26:43 ·
update #3
Animals are a permanent feature of this world,t is not proved only by some seals at Harapp. They probably loved the animals and found them useful just like all others. It is probably only now when animals are becomming extinct due to selfish mentalities. Warriors are made out of frustrations and failures in normal life. An animal become ferocious only when it inflicted with continuous injuries. Otherwise u know pets, seldom use canines unless compelled by circumtances. It is great that people lived among ferocious animals without weapons. . No weapons means either people took them with themselves while shifting to new cities and towns. Weapons left by invading warriors(if any) must also be there. Nobody can abondon beautiful towns without having a better town. Why did invaders left the towns in that manner. If they did so they were really foolish and cannot be expected to create great histories.One may turn shameless/charcterless among strangers but cannot cause mas destruction.
2007-02-24
03:10:09 ·
update #4