To Earl: Lay off the comp, science gave you computers too.
2007-02-20 16:33:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Adia Azrael 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't see anything more moral about Atheists
Dawkins defends science. Science makes the A BOMB. That's moral! (Tell me did the Vatacan, Islam, Hinduism or Buddism MAKE the first A BOMB or was it the US Scientists and don't give me Oppenheimer was a Jew and the Jews made the A BOMB, if Oppenhemier asked his Rabbi about it, he'd tell him to find new work. Mass destruction is not a good job for a nice Jewish boy! And eveyrone knows being a Lawyer or Dentist or Doctor pays more money!)
Science gave us Global Warming via Techonology of the Car and Industry. That's MORAL. That's extinction!
Yeah, just as many Christains drive cars as Atheists, so that makes them EQUALLY responsible!
2007-02-21 00:31:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I define morals as being set "rights & wrongs" that go without any logic. I like to look at each situation I'm in and judge it by reason rather than by rules. So I do not have any morals.
2007-02-21 00:39:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by BloodyHell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's quite the blanket statement, I'm not sure that I agree. I believe that it totally depends on the person who acts on the morals. ie... most people claim to have higher morals than the other, but I ask the question-----does that person abide by them??
2007-02-21 00:28:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by quest girl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im not sure if they have more morals, they are just questioning the value of the old
2007-02-21 00:26:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
do you actually sit down and count the number of morals people have?
christians have absolute morals that are always the same
atheists have relative morals that change over time and from person to person
2007-02-21 00:25:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Won't the answer always be "I do" regardless of which who I is?
2007-02-21 00:25:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Huggles-the-wise 5
·
2⤊
0⤋