Evidence of the after life.?

Question

I chalenge any one out there to read "A Lawer Presents The Case For The Afterlife" by Victor Zammit and try to follow up all the documentation to prove his evidence is not irrefutable.

I my self always believed in a after life, but this book proves it. The Auther is even coming out with a few news specials and possibly a documentry on his studys.

You can read it at victorzammit.com

you don't have to pay for the book, on the left side you will see The Book. click on it and you can read any ch you want. .

Answer 1

You HAVE to be kidding me!
You're actually here hawking a book about a magical candy land?!?
This is the WORST kind of charlatanism; preying on the poor and gullible and their fears.

Answer 2

It would be more interesting to see the documentary. Reading is soooo boring. As for the mentioned remote viewing chapter 18 I have my suspicions about that. However, I do have memories of being part of what now appears to be a classified remote viewing project to train children to be psychics by the government. What ever happened to disclosure? or the alleged biblical Revelations? Same thing? "Fallen" extraterrestrials? Although the whole religious thing seems to be full of holes in some ways it seems preferable to many so-called faithful which is better than fanatical zealots. Just what and who exactly is a false Messiah anyway? Thanks for the link anyway. ZZZZZZZZZ

Answer 3

The logical proof of the immortality of the spirit is this, that no sign can come from a non-existing thing; that is to say, it is impossible that from absolute non-existence signs should appear, for the signs are the consequence of an existence, and the consequence depends upon the existence of the principle. So, from a non-existing sun no light can radiate, from a non-existing sea no waves appear, from a non-existing cloud no rain falls; a non-existing tree yields no fruit; a non-existing man neither manifests nor produces anything. Therefore as long as signs of existence appear, they are a proof that the possessor of the sign is existent.

Consider that today the Kingdom of Christ exists: from a non-existing king how could such a great kingdom be manifested? How, from a non-existing sea, can the waves mount so high? From a non-existing garden, how can such fragrant breezes be wafted? Reflect that no effect, no trace, no influence remains of any being after its members are dispersed and its elements are decomposed, whether it be a mineral, a vegetable, or an animal. There is only the human reality and the spirit of man which, after the disintegration of the members, dispersing of the particles, and the destruction of the composition, persists, and continues to act and to have power.

This question is extremely subtle: consider it attentively. This is a rational proof which we are giving, so that the wise may weigh it in the balance of reason and justice. But if the human spirit will rejoice and be attracted to the Kingdom of God, if the inner sight becomes opened, and the spiritual hearing strengthened, and the spiritual feelings predominant, he will see the immortality of the spirit as clearly as he sees the sun, and the glad tidings and signs of God will encompass him.

Know that the power and the comprehension of the human spirit are of two kinds: that is to say, they perceive and act in two different modes. One way is through instruments and organs: thus with this eye it sees, with this ear it hears, with this tongue it talks. Such is the action of the spirit, and the perception of the reality of man, by means of organs. That is to say, that the spirit is the seer, through the eyes; the spirit is the hearer, through the ear; the spirit is the speaker, through the tongue.

The other manifestation of the powers and actions of the spirit is without instruments and organs. For example, in the state of sleep without eyes it sees, without an ear it hears, without a tongue it speaks, without feet it runs. Briefly, these actions are beyond the means of instruments and organs. How often it happens that it sees a dream in the world of sleep, and its signification becomes apparent two years afterwards in corresponding events. In the same way, how many times it happens that a question which one cannot solve in the world of wakefulness, is solved in the world of dreams. In wakefulness the eye sees only for a short distance, but in dreams he who is in the East sees the West: awake he sees the present, in sleep he sees the future. In wakefulness, by means of rapid transit, at the most he can travel only twenty farsakha an hour; in sleep, in the twinkling of an eye, he traverses the East and West. For the spirit travels in two different ways: without means, which is spiritual traveling; and with means, which is material traveling: as birds which fly, and those which are carried.

In the time of sleep this body is as though dead; it does not see nor hear, it does not feel, it has no consciousness, no perception: that is to say, the powers of man have become inactive, but the spirit lives and subsists. Nay, its penetration is increased, its flight is higher, and its intelligence is greater. To consider that after the death of the body the spirit perishes, is like imagining that a bird in a cage will be destroyed if the cage is broken, though the bird has nothing to fear from the destruction of the cage. Our body is like the cage, and the spirit is like the bird. We see that without the cage this bird flies in the world of sleep; therefore if the cage becomes broken, the bird will continue and exist: its feelings will be even more powerful, its perceptions greater, and its happiness increased. In truth, from hell it reaches a paradise of delights, because for the thankful birds there is no paradise greater than freedom from the cage. That is why with utmost joy and happiness the martyrs hasten to the plain of sacrifice.

In wakefulness the eye of man sees at the utmost as far as one hour of distance, because through the instrumentality of the body the power of the spirit is thus determined; but with the inner sight and the mental eye it sees America, and it can perceive that which is there, and discover the conditions of things and organize affairs. If, then, the spirit were the same as the body, it would be necessary that the power of the inner sight should also be in the same proportion. Therefore it is evident that this spirit is different from the body, and that the bird is different from the cage, and that the power and penetration of the spirit is stronger without the intermediary of the body. Now, if the instrument is abandoned, the possessor of the instrument continues to act. For example, if the pen is abandoned or broken, the writer remains living and present; if a house is ruined, the owner is alive and existing. This is one of the logical evidences for the immortality of the soul.

(Abdu'l-Baha, Baha'i World Faith - Abdu'l-Baha Section, p. 325)

Answer 4

You can't ever positively prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt to anyone who is currently living. But you can simply conclude that if we can live once, then we either cease to exist at our death, or our life energy, or soul continues. It obviously doesn't continue as "physical life," but it more than likely does continue being. It's not such a hard concept to understand if a soul is reality: If your soul can live once, and it goes on living, then you might get to live again in another physical body.

It's really not even an arguable subject for any religion that believes in a soul.

Who knows, you might even get a better bod next time.

Regards,

Chris

Answer 5

There is no proof of life after death. His 1 million dollar challenge is nothing more than the tired old tactic of asking people to prove a negative.

"One million dollars is offered to any skeptic who can rebut the evidence for the existence of the afterlife."

Yup, proving a negative. How he got through the logic games on the LSAT, I'll never know.

Answer 6

If it was actually proven, don't you think everyone would believe in it?

Fact: 2+2=4
Anyone disagree? No

Fact (or so you say): there's an afterlife
Anyone disagree: PLENTY

get the idea?

Answer 7

How about that we have the extra-dimensional (supernatural) beings trying to convince us that there isn't one? One might wonder why us thinking that is so important to them.

Answer 8

oh that looks very intersting
ty for the link , i shall give it a good read xx

physical mediumship is amazing evidence and not enough people know about it

Answer 9

There is an afterlife. It is called death.
"Afterlife" meaning after you are alive. Being alive is existing. After existing is not existing.

Answer 10

If he truly had a gift from God to share with someone, he wouldn't charge money for it.