English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The US or Israel , I personally think it will be Israel the first bomb Iran tests and then the Jericho Missles are gonna fly. We have been at war with Iran since 1979 so i really think a preimptive strike on our part would be great might as well do it now while we got troops and equipment over there. That president of Iran is nuttier than a fruitcake and hes got the little man syndrome soon as he tactical nukes hes gonna try to nuke Israel for sure. GW needs to get his head out his but and say screw Iraq and take care of Iran now before its too late. Love to hear your feedback

2007-02-20 12:33:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

Israel, and they should. It is a travesty,but true. Israel has no choice. It is either take them out or be taken out. Israel is the size of Vermont, surrounded by enemies.
None of the Democrats and very few of the Republicans have the fortitude to see a nuke attack through.
One answer to your question stated that Israel took out a nuclear facility in Iran. However it was in Iraq. The did it with fighter bombers. They are in the planning stages of doing this same thing in Iran, however it is much more difficult. I believe they will eventually opt to use a missile to deliver the nuke. It would serve two purposes. Take Iran back from gaining a Nuke and show the rest of the Arab world they mean business.
The only reason they haven't done the deed is they know the world will label them a rogue nuclear nation.
It is not up to Pres. G. Bush. He has stood in against the gale of Democrat blather. He has stood his ground. No Democrat can say as much.
One thing you should understand, it is not about Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan or any other single Islamic nation. It is a world war between the Christian/Judea belief and the Islamic belief. The Muslim is out to destroy the western way of life. Israel and the Arabs have been at war since Abraham had one son [Ishmael] from his wife's handmaiden of who's descendants are the Arabs and one son [Isaac]from his wife.The promise and covenant made to Abraham was passed down through Isaac.
Both were promised to become fathers of many nations, however Isaac's descendants were to receive the blessing covenant.
Isaac's lineage goes through King David of Israel to Jesus Christ the Messiah.
The Muslim believes that when the Priests of Israel had Jesus put to death, the covenant blessing passed from the Jew to the Arab through Muhammad. Thus the war continues to this day.
Anyway, just remember, it just isn't Iran per se, it's the nation of Islam. Pray for our nation, it is desperate need.
Hisemiester

2007-02-20 13:10:35 · answer #1 · answered by hisemiester 3 · 2 1

Yes, the president of Iran is wacko. So is our president. And you obviously have no concept of present day warfare or foreign relations. You want us to skip from Iraq right over to Iran?!? Hahaha...yeah, sure. No problem. We've got plenty of military just sitting around with nothing to do. And plenty of money. Yeah, riiiiight. We can't even finish Afghanistan properly. Or Iraq for that matter. The military has extended troop tours due to lack of manpower. The nation is going broke, racking up a huge deficit, and you want to spend more to start another war?? That one would be over before it even started!
As for who will nuke who: Iran isn't stupid enough to nuke anyone. They know their whole country would be erased from the map in retaliation. They will build the bomb but then give it away to some lunatic zealot who will be their fall guy as he parks a car in front of the White House with the nuke in the trunk. Then they will shrug and say, "Gee, we don't know where he got that bomb from. It wasn't us. We just use nuclear power to generate electricity for our country." And we'll still be bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan, so our options at that point will be really limited, as they are now. Yup, it's too bad Chimpy has gotten us into a total quagmire by invading a country that had NO WMDs, NO clear ties to Osama, NO part in the 9/11 attacks, and which posed NO real threat to the US. Nice work Bush, you moron.

2007-02-20 12:47:30 · answer #2 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 0 1

Some years ago Iran had a nuclear program that threatened Israel and Israel sent jet bombers to blow up the Iranian facilities just before they were complete. The same will happen again, unless GW intervenes first. Israel will wait to the last possible moment, to get the psychological effect the strongest.

2007-02-20 12:42:01 · answer #3 · answered by Wrath Warbone 4 · 1 1

Iran allows every major religion in its country.
the rulers of iran the clerical side are without a doubt the most pragmatic leaders of any country in area including India.
They are not nuts nor are they going to commit suicide by attacking Israel even and if they ever produce nukes.
When it comes to economics Iran has the ability to far exceed Israel and that is the real threat in area that is causing so much hulabaloo by US and Israel.
Iran is making it on own in a slow and orderly way by training its people, using outside investment and expertise to build state of the art manufacturing facilitys and they are doing it without selling out to World Bank or any foreign country.
Israel on the other hand is a hand out society and depends upon US France Germany and Englands welfare gulilt money in order to survive economicly.Even its militery could never of defeatd the surrounding countrys without that finacing and also the trillions of dolalrs over he years of outsidce free military equipment and intelligence of those three countrys.
The US has slaughtered hundreds of thousands and displaced some 3.9 million more Iraquis while completly botching the takover of Iraq.
From the GOP so called neocon free market Bullcrap they have put a country that was already on the mend from years of deliberate destruction of US and Brits into a land now destroyed so badly and rendered the fabirc of its society so badly it will never be a viable contry again.
So now we want to do the same to Iran just so we can say we did it? We are already attacking iranian soil with our covert aided rebel groups, overflying their lands cutting off their money suply in foreign banks, spending 45 million a year and all of this after it has come out that they offered Rumsfeld a meeting directly and Bushys and that ilk refused. they helped us out in Iraq, balkans Afghanistan and kept the people from revolution captured in good condition just to make Regan look good as president.

What and the hell did Iran ever do to US that makes every boy whose cahones haven't fallen yet want to see us nuke them?
Anyone who believes anything the leaership or military says after the iraq debacle is dumber than a rock and needs to be on front lines with a gun in hand instead of BSing while others are going to die.

2007-02-20 15:51:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No why might you nuke a rustic over a nuclear means plant next you be asserting nuke the single u . s . that below the words of it been set up replaced into to no longer have nuclear weapons ask your self what u . s . it incredibly is.

2016-10-02 11:35:31 · answer #5 · answered by carouthers 4 · 0 0

I believe that Israel will be the first to strike since they are most at risk and they essentially have nothing to lose as they are hated anyway by the Muslim nations.

2007-02-20 12:43:23 · answer #6 · answered by stklotto 4 · 1 1

Iran will nuke us before we do anything...they hate anyone who doesnt believe their radical religion. They all want to die...so they can go to their heaven. so we really cant threaten them will nuclear warfare. Isreal is almost everyones target. they should spare their nukes. the nuclear clock is tickin away...pretty soon we'll be blowin eachother off the face of the earth. its sad.

2007-02-20 12:41:31 · answer #7 · answered by moi 2 · 1 1

No...No...No...and NO! First we shouldn't be in Iraq. Second if we strike Iran we will pisss off China and Russia, possibly starting WW3.

2007-02-20 13:06:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I personally think you think that if one of these two nutty countries starts using nukes you will be safe at home watching TV and I also think that you will be wrong unless you are in Africa.

2007-02-20 12:38:51 · answer #9 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 0 1

Doesn't matter as long as the Iranian president (terrorist) is kill when they do get nuked.

2007-02-20 12:53:46 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers