2007-02-20 10:43:48 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is no way that evolution can be true.
How could anything as stupid as a human have come from anything as smart as a monkey.
Love and blessings Don
2007-02-20 10:50:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Abiogenesis. Where did the first cell come from. After demonstrating that the Stanley Miller experiment is not a good model for evolution, 50 years of research have yielded no answer to the question of the first cell. And the evolutionary explanations go as far as to say cells from outer space may have traveled here on meteors. Evolution is at a loss in this area.
My second question would involve the Cambrian explosion and why there are no transistory fossils leading up to it. Life seems to have suddenly been bursting with new types with no fossil track record. And the theory of "punctuated equilibrium" seems to be grasping at straws to explain this lack.
2007-02-20 19:02:50 · answer #2 · answered by sickblade 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anti-evolutionist? Naw, can't think of one. I need an easier question that can be answered with many responses like, "What's the best anti-creationism question one could say?"
2007-02-20 18:47:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
can't think of any right now. how 'bout a normal one?
Q: why do evolutionists believe evolution has no gaps? even when they find new evidence, it can be opposed easily.
Eg: the fused chromosome. isn't a creature with 47 chromosmes
a) a freak of nature, that is affected in both behavior and body?
b) not likely to reproduce, as animals reject freaks
Eg: the many missing fossil links. who told you that there are no gaps? likely an evolutionist. And think, do YOU have verified proof of fossil records from the first ammoeba up to modern man?
2007-02-20 18:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by Hey, Ray 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
There is a single best question I think. Not just: why would evolution happen? But why would it need to happen? And the only answer to that question would have be that life started from nothing. Which is a little hard to believe, don't you think?
2007-02-20 18:55:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why hasn't macroevolution been demonstrated experimentally using organisms with small lifespans (such as bacteria)
We've seen microevolution occur (mutations and whatnot) but not the creation of a new species.
2007-02-20 18:49:24 · answer #6 · answered by Vegan 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Where are the half monkeys and half men? Where are the transitory species? Did a monkey go to sleep one night and wake up as a human the next morning?
2007-02-20 19:38:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If you're asking us to come up with anything more inane than "why are there still monkeys..." no-one could manage that.
2007-02-20 18:46:41 · answer #8 · answered by Bad Liberal 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like the religious apologist's claim that yes, evolution is a fact, but goddidit.
2007-02-20 18:47:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
"Why must you ask such questions? Just believe what I say (but have no proof of) and keep your mouth shut. Oh...and give us your money."
2007-02-20 18:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by somathus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋