You feel Bush has stabbed our troops in the back?

Question

By lieing about WMD...blowing up the WTC....and starting a bogus war in Iraq?

Answer 1

Hell yeah. America had been robbed in broad daylight for the benefit of the military industrial complexes.

Answer 2

No. In the chest, with a dumbass grin on his chimpanzee face, just like a sociopath.

Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11. Afghanistan and Saudi had, but Saudi financed Bush's oil company. He stabbed the military in the guts when he started a second war for no reason and stopped them from being able to deal comfortably with Afghanistan.

Answer 3

No. Terrorist blew up the WTC. Saddam had WMD the Clinton's, Pelosi and the UN knew and talked publicly about them before President Bush was President. If Saddam would have cooperated with the U.N. he would not be in a box right now.

Answer 4

If you feel Bush has stabbed the troops in the back then how about all the Libs that voted for this war? You call them back stabbers too? What about the first WTC attack under Clinton? Did he bomb it? Did Clinton bomb our embassy, or our USS Cole? I don't know what amazes me the most about you, Nancy... Your hypocrisy, or your stupidity.

Answer 5

Your'e one dumb chick! He didn't blow up the towers and this wa is a bad one i agree with you but you can't stop the war now that you've started it and what happens to all those who died? We need to finish this or at least train more Iraqis to defend their land and then we can leave.

Answer 6

No but the Democratic congress is the best thing to ever happen to Al Quaida.

Answer 7

No, and I heard about what you did to Sabrina and I have also reported you, and have told my friends about what you did, calling her a cuunt, and saying to spread her legs for Cheney and suck Bush's peenis. Just thought that you should know she has friends and they are out to get you. Your husband must be so ashamed, no wonder he went to Iraq.

Answer 8

yes. well not the blowing up the WTC. but the other things. hes sent them to a war thinking they were fighting for a just cause, but what are they doing there now anyway. whats the point?

Answer 9

Read this hot shot!

If you go to the website below, scroll down until you see "2W Post Columnist Scolds Soldiers for Criticizing Those Against War"

Reacting to last Friday's NBC Nightly News story in which some Army soldiers in Iraq expressed frustration with opposition back home to the war, including the contention that there's a contradiction between saying you support the troops but don't support the war, WashingtonPost.com columnist William Arkin, an NBC News military analyst, scolded the troops. In his Tuesday posting, Arkin lectured: "We pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?"

Arkin also took a potshot and the make-up of the armed forces: "The recent NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary -- oops sorry, volunteer -- force that thinks it is doing the dirty work."

In the "Grapevine" segment on Thursday's Special Report on FNC, Brit Hume noted the "ferocious" response to Arkin's posting. To read those comments, scroll to the end of Arkin's piece linked at the bottom of the excerpt below.

The January 29 CyberAlert recounted:

Friday's NBC Nightly News gave rare voice to soldiers in Iraq disturbed by criticism of the war back home. Embedded with the Army's Stryker Brigade's Apache Company (the Fort Lewis, Washington-based 1st Battalion of the 23rd Infantry Regiment) in Hurriya, Richard Engel relayed how "troops here say they are increasingly frustrated by American criticism of the war. Many take it personally, believing it is also criticism of what they've been
| |
More See & Hear the Bias

fighting for. Twenty-one-year-old Specialist Tyler Johnson is on his first tour in Iraq. He thinks skeptics should come over and see what it's like firsthand before criticizing." Johnson asserted: "You may support or say we support the troops, but, so you're not supporting what they do, what they're here sweating for, what we bleed for, what we die for. It just don't make sense to me."

Staff Sergeant Manuel Sahagun directly took on the spin of war critics, complaining that "one thing I don't like is when people back home say they support the troops, but they don't support the war. If they're going to support us, support us all the way." Engel soon powerfully concluded: "Apache Company has lost two soldiers, and now worries their country may be abandoning the mission they died for."

For the full transcript, as well as an audio/video clip, go to: www.mrc.org

An excerpt from Arkin's January 30 "Early Warning" column, "The Troops Also Need to Support the American People," for washingtonpost.com, in which he reacted to what the soldiers said in the NBC Nightly News story:

....I'm all for everyone expressing their opinion, even those who wear the uniform of the United States Army. But I also hope that military commanders took the soldiers aside after the story and explained to them why it wasn't for them to disapprove of the American people....

These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President's handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect.

Through every Abu Ghraib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform, accepting that the incidents were the product of bad apples or even of some administration or command order.

Sure, it is the junior enlisted men who go to jail. But even at anti-war protests, the focus is firmly on the White House and the policy. We don't see very many "baby killer" epithets being thrown around these days, no one in uniform is being spit upon.

So, we pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?...

[T]he recent NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary -- oops sorry, volunteer -- force that thinks it is doing the dirty work.

The notion of dirty work is that, like laundry, it is something that has to be done but no one else wants to do it. But Iraq is not dirty work: it is not some necessary endeavor; the people just don't believe that anymore.

I'll accept that the soldiers, in order to soldier on, have to believe that they are manning the parapet, and that's where their frustrations come in. I'll accept as well that they are young and naive and are frustrated with their own lack of progress and the never changing situation in Iraq. Cut off from society and constantly told that everyone supports them, no wonder the debate back home confuses them.

America needs to ponder what it is we really owe those in uniform. I don't believe America needs a draft though I imagine we'd be having a different discussion if we had one.

Now prove that Bush or the GOP is the problem! If you hate America or our military, vote for a democrat!

Answer 10

Sure, Bush blew up the towers, snuck into the CIA headquarters and changed their classified documents, made up stories about Hussein's link to al Queida, and Bill did not have sexual relations with that woman.