English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean we have enouf bombs to blow up the world 3 times but if we had womd the olny reason we had them is so that irques would be quite.

2007-02-20 09:40:24 · 14 answers · asked by BryanAaron P 1 in Politics & Government Military

14 answers

Your biggest WMD will reach the end of his term in a couple of years...

2007-02-20 09:48:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We have an enormouse amount of WMD. Not just nuclear but chemical, virtual viruses--meaning we can disable their computer network or communications, and biologican weapons. The U.S. has enought nukes to wipe out the whole world. But like most of the nations that have nukes, we will never use them--they're just there to prevent another Pearl Harbor. But countries like Iran or North Korea might sell them in the Black Market.

2007-02-20 19:21:59 · answer #2 · answered by General Vic 2 · 0 0

What are you saying????
Yes the United States has weapons of mass destruction, so do some other responsible countries. It is the nutcases we would like to keep from weapons of mass destruction & the UN ban on adding them must be enforced.. We will never know if Iraq had them & had them unless they use them on someone.

2007-02-20 17:45:43 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1 0

[The US CODE, TITLE 50, CHAPTER 40, SECTION 2302 defines a Weapon of Mass Destruction as follows: "The term 'weapon of mass destruction' means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of (A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors, (B) a disease organism, or (C) radiation or radioactivity." Because the U.S. is a signatory to the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the U.S. military is violating its own military code. By using depleted uranium (which is clearly a WMD and thus illegal) in combat in 4 wars, the U.S. is clearly guilty of the very crime we claimed our right to go to war against Iraq to prevent.

2007-02-20 17:45:46 · answer #4 · answered by Frann 4 · 2 1

We do have wmds. We have more nuclear weapons in our arsenal then even our Allies know about. The difference is control and restraint keep us from using them.

2007-02-20 18:26:14 · answer #5 · answered by Mother 6 · 0 0

because it does. by just keeping them, it makes other nations tense so they build nuclear weapons and then the us builds nuclear weapons and in response other nations build them. so in the end yes the us does have wmds and the reason we know is because they have kept them since the cold war

2007-02-20 17:44:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What do you think a weapon of mass destruction IS? Of course we have them - that's one reason we are a superpower.

2007-02-20 17:50:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"y do people think the us has weapons of mass destruction? "

Maybe it is because I have been to Dugway Proving Grounds.
https://www.dugway.army.mil/
http://www.wdtc.army.mil/

2007-02-20 17:59:48 · answer #8 · answered by tom l 6 · 0 0

We DO have them.
The government even admits to keeping thousands of nuclear warheads in stockpile.

2007-02-20 17:43:47 · answer #9 · answered by Spelunking Spork 4 · 4 0

wow dont listen to Bush's speeches anymore, your grammar sucks and your intelligence is off, the U.S. and Russia have 96% of the worlds nukes.

2007-02-20 17:43:15 · answer #10 · answered by Evil Man 2 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers