2007-02-20 07:38:11 · 18 answers · asked by ? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I love life. If I was offered everlasting life (not "the chance" to have it, or the promise of it, or the idea of it, the real thing), I'd take it.
Sorry. Just being honest.
2007-02-20 07:43:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Save someone else's life.
2007-02-20 07:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by Goodly Devil 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not want everlasting life which will be bore and awful. I prefer to save someone.
2007-02-20 07:41:46 · answer #3 · answered by johnkamfailee 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
save some1 elses life. everlasting life would probably get a bit boring eventually
2007-02-20 07:43:16 · answer #4 · answered by angela n 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely choose to save someone else's life. All I can say is who would want to live on this corrupt world forever. I know that I wouldn't. It gets worst every day and I know that it's not going to get any better. I'm not scared of death, because I know what is waiting for me after this life and it is a whole lot better.
2007-02-20 07:44:15 · answer #5 · answered by kcflds 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
besides the undeniable fact that the considered that is scary i might want to opt for to be an organ donor. i talked about on Oprah that this one guy kept 3 human beings by donating his organs yet there are different strategies to keep peoples' lives or supply a baby a danger to confirm the international
2016-10-17 08:16:10 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This temporal body is not designed to live indefinitely, as such any fantastical details could be the answer but if you able to save someone's life, it is a simple and plain good act?
2007-02-21 02:31:41 · answer #7 · answered by shahinsaifullah2006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's easy because one I want to to and the other I don't want. I pick: save someone else's life.
2007-02-20 07:42:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't the latter lead to the former? They are not mutually exclusive. So I'd "do unto one of the least of these" and take everlasting life when it happens. No rush.
2007-02-20 07:44:40 · answer #9 · answered by Open Heart Searchery 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would choose to save someone elses life.
Everlasting life would be bad enough, without also knowing that you only have it because you let someone die!
2007-02-20 07:59:23 · answer #10 · answered by dm300570 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋