If you accuse someone of being a particular way, look at yourself first. Are you not the same way?
2007-02-20 07:21:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's like the pot calling the kettle black refers to being hypocritical. Both the pot and the kettle blacken over a fire.
2007-02-20 07:21:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by notaxpert 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's when the accuser is as guilty of whatever he is accusing somone else for eg. If you were fat and so was I and I called you a fatty - that would be the pot (me) calling the kettle (you) black - pots and kettles both blacken so they both have the same qualities - one therefore should not accuse the other of having the same thing.
2007-02-20 07:27:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means that you've criticized someone for something you are also guilty of.
So, if a bigot said to his friend, "You're so prejudiced!" that would be a pot calling the kettle black.
2007-02-20 07:25:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Behaviorist 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's from when pots and kettles were all black in color. It's when, e.g., a fat person calls another fat person fat. He is the pot calling the kettle black.
2007-02-20 07:41:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
countless generalizations right here. i are not getting aggravated once you link atheists to communists. Communism wasn't incredibly a bad theory, it in basic terms have been given perverted (much like Christianity) with the help of the grasping and potential-searching for. i'm no communist, yet we actually could do extra for the fewer advantaged and much less for the firms who're putting human beings out of artwork. in easy terms for the checklist: the only time i'm getting aggravated with the help of Christians is whilst they declare they are being "oppressed and persecuted" with the help of our "Liberal society." What a crock of sh*t. What they are incredibly whining approximately is they are attempting to persecute anybody else with the help of forcing their doctrines into rules and the form keeps slapping them down. I additionally get a sprint bored with being instructed i'm stupid, ignorant or silly by using fact i do no longer think in gods. i do no longer unavoidably desire to abolish faith, yet specific, i've got confidence we are under no circumstances going to mature as a species until eventually we get the non secular enthusiasts of each and every faith under administration, and get far off from mythology extra often than no longer. seem on the communicate in this u . s . a . over "clever layout," that's Creationism in sheep's clothing. it is the way for the religionists to get the bible into publicly-funded faculties. we are the only u . s . a . in the international the place this debate is even occurring. it is shameful. faith works very confusing against technological awareness, by using fact if there are medical motives for each little thing, they are in a position to't element to a phenomenon and say "Behold! the potential of God," and that they are in a position to't arise with the money for to lose that kind of impact. And answering questions approximately gods is my way of fostering debate and getting human beings to think of. The loose exchange of recommendations, and the dazzling to disagree, is what keeps our democracy energetic.
2016-09-29 09:27:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by gizzi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It pretty much means "it takes one to know one". basically, you are accusing someone of something that you, yourself, are guilty of.
2007-02-20 07:25:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by ladystardust566 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Someone criticizing someone else for faults they them self have.
2007-02-20 23:44:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anthony F 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means your a hypocrite.
2007-02-20 09:27:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by sportman16977 2
·
0⤊
0⤋