English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yes, illegal trials.

Because , there can be no trial without charges and legal rights?

Stand up my Liberal Brothers and sisters and stop these illegal trials!

2007-02-20 07:06:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

11 answers

The prisoners in Guantanamo are being detained without being charged with crimes and this is a constitutional violation of the right to liberty.

2007-02-20 16:05:49 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 2

I just bet they have a cell you can share with one of your friends down there so you can get a first hand look at things...
Apparently you missed the news about the court order today.....
The court said civilian judges do not have the authority to consider whether the U.S. military is holding foreigners illegally at the Guantanamo naval base in Cuba. The ruling upheld legislation signed by Bush last year that authorizes military tribunals and prohibits detainees from challenging their detention in U.S. courts.

2007-02-20 15:11:27 · answer #2 · answered by missourim43 6 · 1 1

You do that
and you can
thanks to George Bush and America's troop fighting the Nazislamic Fascist you choose to support and apologize for
We should enforce the Gevina convention and hang all terrorist captured not in uniform

2007-02-20 15:24:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 2 0

Good for you....and while you are at it, could you protest beheadings without trials and car bombings without trials and suicide bombings without trials, etc? There are a lot of terrible things that probably should be protested. What are your priorities?

2007-02-20 15:13:43 · answer #4 · answered by Suzianne 7 · 2 0

Go for it an dgo to Guantanamo Bay and walk right up to the gates and douse yourself with gas and catch yourself on fire, that will get their attention. Right on brother, oh, yeah, don't forget to stop, drop and roll.

2007-02-20 15:35:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Article 37.-Prohibition of perfidy
1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy. Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, shall constitute perfidy. The following acts are examples of perfidy:
(a) The feigning of an intent to negotiate under a flag of truce or of a surrender;
(b) The feigning of an incapacitation by wounds or sickness;
(c) The feigning of civilian, non-combatant status; and
(d) The feigning of protected status by the use of signs, emblems or uniforms of the United Nations or of neutral or other States not Parties to the conflict.
2. Ruses of war are not prohibited. Such ruses are acts which are intended to mislead an adversary or to induce him to act recklessly but which infringe no rule of international law applicable in armed conflict and which are not perfidious because they do not invite the confidence of an adversary with respect to protection under that law. The following are examples of such ruses: the use of camouflage, decoys, mock operations and misinformation.

2007-02-20 15:11:35 · answer #6 · answered by Celebrate Life 3 · 1 2

Yes! Hug all the trees in your neighborhood and change your lightbulbs to help free our terrorist friends!

2007-02-20 19:13:38 · answer #7 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 0 1

This is not a question. It is a rant. It does not belong on a Q!A site.

2007-02-20 15:09:38 · answer #8 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 4 1

how did you figure that one out.??

2007-02-21 16:05:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

amen to that.

2007-02-20 15:57:29 · answer #10 · answered by acid tongue 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers