English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should Bush (i dont address him as president of the USA)go to the gallows for conspiring the whole world into a war zone and debating on crimes, forcng democracy ,on conspiracy ,on targeting mass people to death by killing them on suspect of a terrorist (only 1 or two in number )but bringing down great destruction on people whom he thinks and correctly conspires as terrorists and a danger to the freedom of the people of america,creating clashes between two sects as a perfect reason to stay back long enough to empty its wealth and infrastructure,,in the belief of bringing law and order to the country,to rule other countries by dividing their own people,to creat self destruction of one or two good american citizens and blame it on terrorists organization,,,,,,,,,,,its like killing two birds with one arrow ,,, i could keep on giving reasons to justify my Q but lets see your feed backs

2007-02-20 06:24:56 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

40 answers

I am opposed to capital punnishment even for a rat like Bush. So maybe we can lock him up on Guantanamo in the hot sun and make him live on bread and a teeny bit of water and forget where we left the key. If I were in favor of capital punnishment I would say he deserves no less than any other war criminal or dictator.

2007-02-20 06:30:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Frist off, if you are capable of writing a run-on sentence that long, you should be hanged. Secondly, it is killing two birds with one stone, although theoretically it is more plausible with 1 arrow. Get your figures of speech correct. Now that we have that out of the way.

1-Consiring the whole world into a war zone is not crime, if leaders of other country take our word for everyhing they are stupid.

2-Forcing democracy is sort of not possible. Democracy cannot be forced, democracy is a form of government ruled by the people, if people either accept it or reject it, it can't be forced.

3-Targeting mass people to deach by killing them on suspecting them to be terroists? Um, there are civilian casualties in war unfortunately, but civilians weren't take out back and shot. Using that logic Truman should have been hanged for Japan in 1945.

4-Bringing down great desctruction onf people...ect,ect..-See #3

5-He did not created clashed between sects, the Shi'a and the Sunnis have always hated each other. Sadaam would kill the Shi'a and support the Sunnis. Since the Shi'a were no longer afraid of retribution they attacked the Sunnis, and the Sunnis didn't like it and they attacked back. I simplified things a little, but you get the point. Saddam being removed from power created a vacuum.

6-Empty its wealth and infrastructure? Come on, the country has very little infrastructure to begin with, and you can't really steal infrastructure, the meaning of the word explains why that isn't possible. Did the war destroy what little infrastructure the country had? Yeah, but the price of war, every war, supported, or not, justified or not, has hurt the infrastructure of country where it was fought.

7-We aren't trying to rule Iraq, we are putting in a government that is of course sympathetic to the US, but we aren't ruling the country.

8-What self destruction of 1 or 2 good Americans Citizens? You lost me on that one.

So, why should Bush be hanged agian? Oh, you do mean President Bush, not Reggie Bush right? Because Reggie Bush shouldn't have taunted Brian Urlacher, but that doesn't mean he should be hanged.

2007-02-20 06:54:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

It is true that George bush has committed crimes against humanity but but you cannot hang him as he is the president of USA (even if you do not address him so). Now you must have understood the difference between developed countries and developing countries. Countries which are developed can exercise their power on the developing countries. However i think that george bush is feeling as if he is the only person who can get rid of terrorism in this world. That is why he is acting like that. I still wonder why he has got a second term as president of USA. Maybe he has done no mistakes other than declaring wars on other countries. Going by the present events, I think that Pakistan is next in line for an attack by USA ( George Bush)

2007-02-20 11:08:46 · answer #3 · answered by sagar kumar 2 · 0 2

Let's ask one of the family members of someone who died on 9/11 -- you putz.
How many attacks have taken place on American soil since Bush retaliated? You sound like a traitor to me & you should be over there risking YOUR life for the right to speak as you wish & spread your hogwash without fear of reprisal.
Many people may not realize it now (just as many people had a problem with Lincoln & a handful of other awesome presidents who had the guts to do the right thing in spite of becoming a target of criticism by people like you) but President Bush will someday be known in the history books as one of our greatest presidents!!

2007-02-21 08:39:06 · answer #4 · answered by celia17 3 · 0 0

YES,
George W Bush should be Hanged for his deeds.
Because He does not Know to live in the society .
and he want to become a dictator of the world. He do not know the meaning of Justice Tolerance . He is the President of a powerful nation so he do crime against the Humanity He should be hanged and his aims and his destructive mind should also be crushed.

2007-02-21 03:24:30 · answer #5 · answered by Undertaker 1 · 0 1

it's all in the eye of the public. bush was seen as a leader and saddam was seen as a evil tyrannt. bush didn;t have people executed for disagreeing with him, while saddam did. bush didn;t use children as props, saddam did. bush didn't try to invade neighboring countries, saddam did. Even though i myself despoised bush, I don;t think he's on the same level as saddam, osama and hitler.

2016-05-23 23:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It seems you are a Saddam Hussein fanatic. I guess if you have lowered yourself to Saddam's level, then you must have the right to whine about what GWB has done to free the citizens of Iraq and what he's done to stop coward terrorists from attacking the US again. It seems you are disappointed that terror isn't running ramped in America like it was in your beloved Saddam's country before GWB put a stop to it. Move to Iraq if you are un-happy here.

2007-02-22 23:09:48 · answer #7 · answered by ravi p 1 · 0 0

It seems you are a Saddam Hussein fanatic. I guess if you have lowered yourself to Saddam's level, then you must have the right to whine about what GWB has done to free the citizens of Iraq and what he's done to stop coward terrorists from attacking the US again. It seems you are disappointed that terror isn't running ramped in America like it was in your beloved Saddam's country before GWB put a stop to it. Move to Iraq if you are un-happy here.

2007-02-21 00:52:48 · answer #8 · answered by dp 2 · 0 0

Yes, Bush should be hanged the same way as Saddam was hanged because he is the person who has caused all these problems in his neighbouring states and he is the person who has all the people in U.S.A. corrupt and dirty minded.He is the person who is teaching the other nuclear states to began wars with weaker countries and the third world countries. Bush should surely be killed because once he is killed all the problems will be solved and the fear of the weaker countries will be reduced

2007-02-21 03:09:29 · answer #9 · answered by Berty 1 · 0 1

We'll worry about that when the French Foreign Legion marches down Pennsylvania Avenue and captures President Bush in the oval office.

2007-02-20 13:59:33 · answer #10 · answered by John H 6 · 1 0

Q&A will not allow a real answer but let me say one thing - It does not matter what you chose to call him his name is President George W. Bush, our Commander in Chief. You lack of respect for the office of President is appalling & disgraceful.
To even comsider comparing President Bush to a mass murderer like Saddam shows a complete lack of knowledge or understanding of history. You can twist history but you can not rewrite it. There is no justification for your lack of repect for the United States of America & it's leader.
In 51 yrs , I have had a lot of presidents I did not like but the office I have always repsected.

2007-02-20 10:17:21 · answer #11 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers