Scientist discovered that it is possible to walk on water, or walk on air;would that be enough to convince you that the Bible is true?
2007-02-20 03:52:08 · 20 answers · asked by Maurice H 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i already know that the bible is true
2007-02-20 03:55:08 · answer #1 · answered by redhottreject06 3 · 1⤊ 6⤋
rofl. No, not really. It would convince that its possible to walk on things like air and water (yeah right), that doesn't make the bible true.
Christians keep assuming that because PARTS of the bible are based on fact (names and locations), that means that all of the bible is true when it doesn't mean that at all. It means that the writers of the time used some real places to make it more personal.
Harry Potter books talk about London, does that make all the Harry Potter books true too?
No, proof of the bible would mean you have to first find proof of a god. Then, and only then, would the Christian religion have a leg to stand on.
2007-02-20 11:58:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. because even the church is not entirely convinced that everything in the bible is true. some bible scholars merely call it an "inspired" work, meaning that the bible was written by ordinary mortals inspired by a "higher" being. but no matter. I do believe in God and I do believe in good. With or without the bible.
2007-02-20 11:58:02 · answer #3 · answered by girlalive 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Air planes sort of walk on air. If you had asked this question 200 years ago, would a piper cub flying overhead have proved the existence of God? The answer is NO.
2007-02-20 12:00:20 · answer #4 · answered by mrbillder 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That only address one of the problems with the Bible. Besides, if a man figures out how it could be done, then it could be said that Jesus was also just a man who figured it out. I think it would actually do more harm to the Jesus myth than help.
2007-02-20 12:00:30 · answer #5 · answered by Wisdom in Faith 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh? If science were able to prove that, then everyone would be able to walk on water with enough practice, which would in turn make Jesus just like the rest of us, defeating the purpose.
2007-02-20 11:56:38 · answer #6 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i don't understand what is in the people's mind, Ask this kinds irrelevant question. If they are true believer they should ask what is the meaning of human life and what is God's eternal economic for the people on earth.
2007-02-20 12:20:33 · answer #7 · answered by magnanimous29 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, all that would do is prove that your Jesus was just a man who learned how to do it. Really a bad argument you got there. Besides, you forget a big part of the reason I reject your God has to do with moral reasons.
2007-02-20 12:09:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miracles are only proof of anything for those who witness them. The evidence is in the fulfillment of prophecy.
2007-02-20 11:58:15 · answer #9 · answered by regmor12 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean if Science were to be completely wrong? I think I would just go nuts at that point. Perhaps while I was at it I would become Christian.
2007-02-20 11:56:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's never going to be proven that's why it's called a miracle. If god wanted to prove he existed he had to do some thing we couldn't
2007-02-20 11:57:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋