English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

yes!! so long as they didnt have them prior to cooking !!!

2007-02-20 02:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sure. There's an old mind-teaser that says something like you go to get a haircut in a new town and there are only two barbers. One's hair is chopped badly, and the other's is neatly cut. Who do you go to?

You go to the barber with the bad hair, because obviously he cut the hair of the neater barber, and the neater barber did the bad cut.

So following that, no teeth means you don't want food from wherever HE eats, but his food is probably tops.

2007-02-20 03:12:47 · answer #2 · answered by chefgrille 7 · 0 0

Any type of intoxicant is outlawed in Islam. in accordance to how strictly he adheres to his faith, your mom's husband would or would no longer have an subject with cooking wine. i'd challenge to wager that he would like it no longer be protected interior the dish, extraordinarily because the entire "alcohol getting cooked out of foodstuff" element is thoroughly pretend. It does decrease the most target slightly, and regularly the quantity is minuscule to commence with, notwithstanding the alcohol remains there usually. reckoning on the recipe you're utilizing, i'd say everywhere from 40-ninety% of the alcohol will stay. (huge choice, i comprehend, yet there are truly some recipes for mussels accessible!) Mussels in fowl inventory will be outstanding. for sure in case you do not comprehend how the fowl became killed and once you'll be very strict about it, you should likely follow vegetable inventory, or perhaps fish inventory (notwithstanding in my opinion i have not at all tasted it so i'm able to't advise it). in simple terms make positive the mussels are not alive once you throw them interior the pot :)

2016-12-04 10:13:24 · answer #3 · answered by fuents 4 · 0 0

why not ?
the landlord at my local had an accident and has no front teeth or dentures at the moment but the food he makes for the pub is still nice and tasty.

2007-02-20 02:09:40 · answer #4 · answered by Gyp77 4 · 0 0

Hmmm! I'm picturing those old guys you used to see gurning while wearing some kind of horses collar.

Actually, I could imagine Anthony Worral Thomson doing that so yes - yes I would.

2007-02-20 07:14:59 · answer #5 · answered by dm300570 2 · 0 0

I have found that sometimes these not so pleasant looking types are Great down-home cooks. Don't knock it till you try it. (Are they dirty in appearance as well? Look at your local fast food chain workers, are they clean or greasey looking??) I hope I made my point.

2007-02-20 02:04:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes,my ken has no teeth at present and cooks good food,he eats it too lol

2007-02-20 02:03:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What? Why not? Better that than a cook who's been biting the ingerdients.

2007-02-20 02:03:42 · answer #8 · answered by 'H' 6 · 0 0

sure. my granddad made the best sunday roasts ever.
And he had to pop his teeth in to enjoy it.

2007-02-20 02:10:15 · answer #9 · answered by renegade 2 · 0 0

yeah why not the cook may just have very bad gum disease....or they may just like sweet food...can't blame them for that....

2007-02-20 02:04:31 · answer #10 · answered by loopyloo 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers