The Rabbi refused to admit that the circumcision had anything to do with the babies death. Wouldn't it be the case if this was a sexual assault where a paedophile had mutilated a child and it had died he would rightly be locked away... but the Rabbi and the group of men attending the mutilation ceremony just shrugged it off, no convictions, is this right?
2007-02-20 01:54:08 · 9 answers · asked by CHEESUS GROYST 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No it's NOT! are the parents doing anything about it! and why are rabbi's doing this shouldn't it be a doctor!
2007-02-20 01:58:40 · answer #1 · answered by liza 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here is a link to the story in the Britt press.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/tm_headline=7-day-old-died-after-circumcision%26method=full%26objectid=18623664%26siteid=89520-name_page.html
The child had a heart attack 15 minutes after being ritually mutilated. They aren't sure what caused it. How dumb are they.
They have a rule that if three brothers die from circumcision a forth brother will be exempt from the required circumcision, who says they don't have a heart.
I
2007-02-20 17:46:02 · answer #2 · answered by cut50yearsago 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
where is your source for this story? i have searched yahoo uk news and not seen any thing on this - i would have to imagine that you read this in the news, or at the very least saw the report on television.
perhaps if the medical care system in the UK actually provided for circumcision at birth, there wouldn't be any incidents like the one you describe. and no, this is not a sexual assault. if this actually happened, it was a horrible accident. I have never heard of anything like this happening as a result of circumcision, and note: people of the Jewish faith have been following this tradition since the time of Abraham.
2007-02-20 02:09:58 · answer #3 · answered by SmartAleck 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Im against Child Circumcision, because I believe its the childs body, and they should have the choice to do it themselves. (Unless medically required)
My answer will be biassed, and Im happy to admit that.
The Rabbi, and all those who mutalate a child for what ever reason, should be sentenced to a slow and painful death. And suffer in what ever hell they can imagine follows death.
Its sick and its wrong, and the sooner people relised Abraham was a skitzophernic to the point of Homocide, we can end this "remove the flesh from around your penis to seal the covenant" bulls**t.
2007-02-20 02:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by Occult NZ 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Maybe involuntary manslaughter. But I would hardly compare the rabbi to a pedophile.
2007-02-20 01:58:42 · answer #5 · answered by Havana Brown 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It it were a doctor, he would at least be sued for malpractice. That's just so horrible!
2007-02-20 02:03:25 · answer #6 · answered by liberpez 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Now, if only you had been a rabbi that night . . .
2007-02-20 01:57:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Um...you are aware that most baby boys get circumcised...right? And most of the time it's the doctor who does it. Religion has little to do with it nowadays...
2007-02-20 01:57:25 · answer #8 · answered by Open Heart Searchery 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
by any chance do you have a source for this?
2007-02-20 02:57:45 · answer #9 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋