In many countries the official definition of poverty is set as the bottom 20% of society -- the lowest of the five defined quintiles within the census data. The "value" at which poverty exists is, in turn, established by the level at which the lowest quintile is defined. In this manner, "poverty" always encompasses the lowest 20% of the population and while the income level at the top of that quintile may rise, official poverty is set by definition at 20%.
By definition, the lowest income will always be zero and as such it is a myth to suggest that the poor are "getting poorer": zero remains zero. However, the level of the uppermost quintile has no limit. Thus, in a prosperous society it is to be expected, and desirable, that the level at which the top quintile is defined should increase. But since the base remains at zero, any growth in an economy can be expected to increase the "gap" between rich and poor.
Because of these probabilities, Henderson points out that what is of greater interest is what the census data themselves reveal about the various quintiles and the composition of the households they represent. What the census numbers show is that the highest quintile has the highest percentage of married, dual-income households in direct contrast to the unemployed, unmarried households prevalent in the lowest quintile.
The numbers are clear:
'that staying out of, or getting out of, the lowest quintile is not rocket science...if you want to have an extremely high probability of avoiding the lowest quintile, get a job, ideally a full-time job, and live with someone who has a job'.
This is not an area where we need to keep defining the problem. As Henderson states, we do need to read the data fully and properly. And we do need to focus on defining solutions to further facilitate the passage out of poverty for those who seek to leave. Employment opportunities, stable family environments and a sense of community. Politically, the divisions arise in the approach to these solutions. Sadly, too many within politics care too little about the people for whom policies are designed and rather too much about their own stature as the designers, controllers, planners and/or managers
2007-02-20 00:45:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Poverty and illitracy are common problems faced by many countries today. measures should be taken to reduce the rate of poverty in a certain nation.firstly,poor people should be provided with job opportunities, so that they can earn some money to be stable.secondly, they should be provide with proper houses to live in and funds should be collected through different methods, (for example- through the process of sms system and advertisements about the policy on television,radio,Internet etc,..) to promote this cause.As far as illitracy is concerned government schools should be built up in several areas so as to make the transportation facility easy and advertisements should be made on television,radio,Internet etc,,.. to spread the awareness about the importance of education in life. i hope these measures if implied can reduce the rate of poverty and illitracy in our nation as well as in other nations.
2007-02-23 06:18:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
(1). Those boyes & girls are working as maid servent (below 18 yrs)
in a house or shopkeeper, we have to reach with themselves &
motivated to better education, it can be done the by the social worker, NGO organisations, and a campagin from the govt levels,
(2). Day by day education is costly, The central govt's having a several guidelines that " education is for all" - but, it can not follows
our politicians or any society organisations, like social welfare organisations etc.
(3). To avoid the poverty, education is essential
(4). The BPL group of our country - are not doing such a jobs,
whether they can provide education, to their childrens . In that case, the MICRO FINANCE, is most urjent to the rural people,
whether, they can earn some thing, the poverty will be avoid more or less, in our high populated country.
It is possible, more or less, If, we do follows in above points.
2007-02-20 10:09:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by diprodiptaBanerjee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
to avoid poverty and illitracy first we should stop child labour.then start giving free educations in all possible schools.to avoid poverty we should first stop under-table money for every single thing there is under-table money.due to this poor peole do not take futher steps because they have no money.secondly poor people should be given correct amount of salary.they should be paid for what they desever.thirdly ban all the bars in bangalore besause if spoils many people's life and family.
2007-02-20 10:30:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to me the main head is the government. If they support then surely poverty rate would be 0 percent. But if they do not help then the poverty rate would increase. To avoid poverty and illiteracy government should take certain steps. Education must be made free of cost so that poor people can study and become literate.
2007-02-22 04:35:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Poverty & illitracy can be eliminated with a plan of action to ensure that education is made a Fundamental right, to ensure that quality education is available free of cost to the the students in our rural sector ( who form 80 % of our population) and more importantly feed them with good food till they finish their education.
2007-02-23 06:10:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by V.T.Venkataram 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Poverty needs to be removed on moral and humanitarian grounds. To avoid poverty and illiteracy we should follow the following points:
1. Sharing my education and things in kind to the less fortunate and poor children.
2. They should be given god job opportunities suitable to their cadre.
3. They should also be given the rights to vote.
4. Increase in economic growth
5. Development in agriculture.
6. Development in cottage and small scale industries.
7. Control of population.
8. Redistribution of land holdings.
9. Provision of cheap food grains to the poor.
10. Taking up programmes to remove poverty such as self employment schemes, etc,.
11. Increase trade relationships.
12. Wars should not be fought between countries.
2007-02-21 11:32:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Berty 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
To avoid poverty and illiteracy is to improve the standard of living and education status in India. Firstly take as much donation as necessary, and remove corruption in it. Secondly leave no child behind educate every human, be it a child or an old person.
2007-02-21 01:19:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by chandini 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
as we know that our country is being facing from poverty since the britishers have encouared our country many program have been there but only some effected
we can avoid poverty by reducing pricers for poor like in housery things and many we can make free edcation for te iilerate or we canmake hoardings to send cildern in the goverment school whuch will be free. poverty acan also be removed by first making them educated and then givig some or other jobs
2007-02-23 06:37:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let there be no section, group, class, denomination of Indians who are destined to remain impoverished, uneducated only because they were born in that denomination etc. Otherwise illiteracy and poverty shall remain a Sign of India. A scar. A distinctive feature of Indians as a nation..
2007-02-20 09:02:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by sunamwal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋