Your question is very interesting and it reminded me of my early years in school. Here in the USA..back in the 1950's our classrooms were so different from today's ways of teaching. We didn't have computers, calculators, free time to walk around the classroom and many other things.
We were on a tight schedule. There was order in the classroom. You didn't see many students upset the class only a few boys and hardly any girls. There were girls who were athletic types but they were not out of control.
We had respect for the teachers and the head of the school the principal. No one made noises while walking down the hall of the school on the way to the library, lunchroom or auditorium. You would think it was military school.
All these things affected the students how we learned and if we passed at the end of the school year. If there is order the student has a better chance to learn. if they are in a very uncontrolled schoolroom there is not much of a chance for the student to concentrate on their studies.
If the child does not take school seriously then they are going to play sick when it's exam time. It's the parents job to know what is going on in the classroom and check with the teacher once in a while about their child's assignments. If the child has a parent who is interested then he or she is going to work hard to please himself and satisfy himself as well as his parents.
Parents have a responsibility to their children to feed them, keep them safe at home and be responsible to them in seeing they study and get their education or they are going to be a problem later in life to family, friends and the people who they work for.
Everything in life fits together like a puzzle...if one piece is missing the puzzle is not finished and not accepted.
2007-02-19 23:04:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mama Jazzy Geri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does the actual study or just the mail's editorialising indicate that its female teachers. Hartley herself uses the word adult while the mail uses the inserts the word women and then notes "The study drew no distinction between the beliefs and classroom practices of male and female teachers" i.e. the study can't really speak for you or the mail's idea. Hardly shocking that the Mail would come out with this given its target readership. More to the point women teachers have outnumbered male teachers long before the boy crisis since the 1870s and through 1960-80, suddenly in 1990 this idea resurfaced. Its hardly old though it was one of the principled behind setting up the boy schools because men were being feminised in the home. In fact her research just points out that schools characterise boys in a certain way(where hartley says adults endorse stereotypes the mail writes women urge boys to act in feminine ways-not the study). Also the researcher suggests that teachers reinforce and expect boys low performance as masculine so I don't think it works alongside the argument that teachers are surpressing masculinity as the mens movement would argue. and many other studies show that laddish behaviour is important in determining antiswot attitudes as well. While boys are expected to act this way girls that do are harshly criticised according to research by diane ray. Its unusual that social constructions don't exist. Em except in the social construction of boys underperfomance by female teachers according to you. and only the state and women can socially construct("engineer") things not churches, communities familes or peers- What a double standard.
2016-05-23 22:13:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Forcing them to do many thing at their early age. It is not their choice & too much work load. Main reason is the competition between the parents, they want their children to get the top rank. American system they don't give anything in this type.
2007-02-19 23:02:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Expression 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question can be applied only to cases of children getting low marks in spite of the best efforts put in by them, their parents and by their school. In most cases, the above rule(contained in the question) cannot be applied.
2007-02-20 23:42:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by spiritual healer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The main reason is the Childness what they carry and I belive all the children ( even you and me ) has gone through this phase in life. So there is nothing to worry let it be, it will automatically done.
2007-02-19 23:00:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by devangdani 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question? many times children find it difficult, bcz theydo not knew what they learning ,that means what they learning is not understandable to them .they do not know the meaning of the particular subject and wheather it will help them in future.
2007-02-19 23:02:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too much of syllabus...
A head ache for the Childrens.
2007-02-19 22:49:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by AVANISH JI 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
their parents arnt as strict and dont care anymore
they havnt been taught that education is very important...most kids realize later that they should have paid attention
2007-02-19 22:55:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by ~jessi~ aka....mommy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋