He thinks that Roe v. Wade should be overturned.
Too bad. I had respect for him until I heard that.
2007-02-19 13:19:57 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hey Serena, God approves of ripping apart babies in and out of the womb. Read the bible little girl.
2007-02-19 13:27:52 · update #1
The Supreme Court of the USA has reversed itself on a number of issues when it found the previous ruling was wrong or that new information came out.
For example, the Supreme Court has said that no matter how violent the crime, we can not execute someone if they committed the crime when they were under 18.. The justification for their ruling was that NEW medical information confirms the brains of kids are not fully mature until they are around 18. So since the kids do not have mature brains, they should not have to pay the mature price for their deeds.
Now take it one step further. What if NEW medical information came out that during an abortion the fetus feels horrendous pain as it is ripped apart by the suction machine or cutting blade of the scraper? Would that not also tend to make the Supreme Court rethink their ruling in Roe vs Wade? Is it right for a woman to be able to abort her fetus if the fetus is torn apart and fully aware at the time?
Also at the time of Roe vs Wade, there were not many ways of birth control. Today we have over 12 different birth control methods. Should it be necessary to keep abortion around as a "mistake eraser" when we have so many "mistake prevents" available?
I think Roe vs Wade is going to be reversed and it may be a Liberal court that does it. After all, Liberals do not even want to execute criminals for their acts. Give them an excuse to reverse Roe vs Wade they will take it...
2007-02-19 19:56:32 · answer #1 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why the hell could he teach concern somebody who's already showing such weak spot in the eyes of the yank public, he has human beings blabbing off with off the cuff feedback left top and middle of his campaign making him look thoroughly no longer worth fo be the subsequent President. Wes clarks comments regardless of the undeniable fact that harmless they may be are an insult to the intelligence of the yank public, he sits there wittering on approximately how McCains militia adventure no longer being proper to being Commander in chief as though no one is conscious that, jointly as the dumb chump Obama sits beside him nodding like the fairway ******** he so of course is. nicely executed Mr Clark for preserving the bloody glaring, now bypass and and play with your toy tanks and dream approximately what would have been in the past you have been retired. P.s save up the sturdy paintings your doing for Mr Obama!!!
2016-11-24 19:07:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't let McCain fool you. He's a lying, two-faced, spineless sack of dung.
Wait until he gives a speech at the Discovery Institute (the leading peddlers of Intelligent Design) to see just what a pandering SOB he is.
And for you Right-To-Lifers...if you think for a moment that "conservative" is going to overturn Roe v. Wade and thus lose a sure-fire way to get you sheep to the polls, you got another thing coming.
2007-02-19 13:24:44 · answer #3 · answered by gebobs 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
"I had respect for him until I heard that."
Yeah. Too bad he doesn't support child murder. Maybe one day I'll get a court decision that says I can "choose" the fates of others... Like women from Texas!
Then again... who needs a court decision?
2007-02-19 15:26:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares. Unless Bush causes a miracle to happen in Iraq, there is no chance of the GOP getting in in 08. Eight years of lies is all this country will tolerate.
2007-02-19 13:27:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
he's an empty suit with an emptier head...self-proclaimed 'maverick and 'independent thinker'...the only thing remotely interesting about him is the fact that you can't see bush's lips move when mccain talks...that and the fact that he'll do whatever pandering is necessary to win the nomination...kinda like romney-is he a moderate or a conservative this week?
2007-02-19 13:27:02 · answer #6 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have even more respect for him now. It's rare to hear a politician speak the truth.
May God Bless you.
2007-02-19 13:30:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
He is way too PTSD to ever have presidential power... let alone such a silly stand on Roe V Wade...
Pity...
2007-02-19 13:24:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
It's called "courting the base".
2007-02-19 13:22:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Don't worry, nobody wants a fossil for president.
2007-02-19 13:31:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋