you know...a filmic equivalent of roy stuarts erotic photography....
erotic and classy....but with no "action"
if burlesque is making a comeback...doent that suggest that guys are as aroused if not more so..by women dressed provocatively..than by women with no clothes on at all?
surely im not alone in being turned on as much by lingerie photographs and erotic/sexy photography in glossy art&beauty magazines as your average top shelf magazine?
2007-02-19 09:21:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
Yes, I think there is a market for it. I completely agree with you that it's nice to watch "soft porn" where they leave some things to your imagination. It's nice to fill in the blanks with your own flights of fantasy ... I've always found the writings of Anais Nin really erotic, and would love to see the film/screen equivalent of that!
2007-02-19 10:11:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Italian director Tinto Brass specialises in this kind of film. Many of his films have A LOT of great women naked and being playful. His films also have a light comedy touch and entertaining plots that although simplistic are reasonably well written.
2007-02-19 17:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by monkeymanelvis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. It's referred to as 'soft-porn'..they're shown on hbo and other premium channels. They're not showing penetration, but some full frontal nudity...not much lippage, either...Without lippage, or penetration, who know what's going on down there? The dude would have to be gay, to fake that.
2007-02-19 17:28:17 · answer #3 · answered by jemrx2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Soft core.
2007-02-19 17:24:11 · answer #4 · answered by ndtaya 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called 'Soft Porn'. And its dull.
2007-02-19 17:23:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋