English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Why the over-whelming need to be a monkey? never could quite figure this one out myself.

2007-02-19 08:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0 1

No. Using science to analyze revelation is foolish.

God reveals, man observes. And you need to know the difference.

Two examples: Proof the God exists using the scientific method. Or Can God create a rock that He can not lift.

For the first question, there are no God facts, observations by persons independent of location about God. Especially since God existed before He created the observable. Which means God exists in the unobservable something we can not observed.

Second question requires revelation and God did tell us. So much for rocks and lifts.

Now take that monkey off yours and everyone else back. Evolution is a scientific theory that accounts for some facts (observations by persons independent of location). It says nothing about revelation.

2007-02-19 17:07:44 · answer #2 · answered by J. 7 · 0 0

No. Scripture can never fit Evolution since scripture was written by those who had no idea of it's existence.

No matter how hard you try, it just won't work. Soon, something else will take Evolutions place at being at odds with the bible. Eventually, the bible will just get buried under so much truth it will break.

2007-02-19 16:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Blue 4 · 0 0

But who made the first monkey?

2007-02-19 16:57:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

one makes a good point why does everyone want to prove we came from monkeys do you really like bananas do actually like sleeping in your own filth do you like living with fleas and ticks and eating them off of your mate I DONT SO WHY DOES EVERYONE ELSE ??

2007-02-19 17:02:29 · answer #5 · answered by THE WAR WRENCH 4 · 0 0

God isn't a monkey, He is a dog!
GOD=DOG

2007-02-19 16:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Have you been watching "Planet of the Apes"?

2007-02-19 16:58:07 · answer #7 · answered by mithril 6 · 0 0

Why, are you planning a re-writing session?

2007-02-19 16:57:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. If they were ape-like creatures, maybe.

2007-02-19 16:56:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe they were really dinosaurs.

2007-02-19 16:56:32 · answer #10 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers