Would you rather see Saddam or Bin Laden free...?

Question

Would you have rather seen Saddam free and Bin Laden captured, or Bin Laden free and Saddam captured, for the following time periods.

1 ...right after 9/11
2 ...right after the beginning to the Iraq War
3 ...right now

This is all hypothetical

Answer 1

Let's hope their both dead

Answer 2

According to this site Bush caused 9/11 2) no problem with Saddam (I'm a traitor right?) 3) Saddam is history I Don't believe we'll ever capture bin laden he's pretty smart (I.m a traitor right??)

Answer 3

Saddam is already free and it up to us, the USA to capture Bin Laden and do the same to him. So both of them be free and out of this world and with their 79 virgins some where in Hell.

Answer 4

bin laden is a much greater danger to the usa before and after the 9/11 attacks.

saddam, as bad a guy as he was, presented no direct threat to the usa.

bin laden orchestrated and helped to finance an attack on american soil.

saddam never did any such thing.

bin laden has no army, no nation, no flag or organized army.

saddam, as bad as he was, at least had an army that met ours in the field of battle and lost.

there is honor to earned and lost on the field of battle - saddam lost his there.

bin laden has no courage and doesn't even acknowledge the possibility of winning on the field of battle an honor.

bin laden lives, and all of lives are less safe because of it...

Answer 5

We know that it's too late for Saddam, and probably the same for bin Laden. Osama hasn't shown his face for some time now, chances are the old bastard croaked and they are just letting him fade away. This way, he will become a legend in his own time, even though it may be passed!

Answer 6

Well Saddam is already free from the bonds of life. He is free to roam hell all he wishes. Bin Laden will never be free.

Answer 7

Mate, you're deluded. Bin weighted down has admitted his area in it various cases. the problem is that the FBI and CIA are globally recognized as being no longer very stable and its no longer likely that their cyber web internet site is as much as date. If the information is dated 1999 then thats whilst it is going to likely be from and that of direction is 3 years in the previous the 9/11 assaults. If the information replaced into as much as date it would coach an replace date. As for Wikipedia, its a reference library and would not adjudge on the guilt of an untried guy. If Bin weighted down have been cleared then the administration would not be retaining lots of the wests maximum suitable particular forces mountain climbing up and down mountains searching for him.

Answer 8

1)Saddam freed-didn't do 9/11
2)Saddam freed-didn't do any thing but protect his country
3)too late he is dead now

Saddam never did anything wrong to our country even if he did do bad things to his own.Bin Ladin on the other hand should be caught and placed under a skyscraper which will collapse under him so he knows how 9/11 felt

Answer 9

I have a better idea (not difficult I admit).

Let's turn Saddam loose now and kill Bin Laden.

The Saudis know where Bin Laden is, instead of ignoring him or keeping him for a political pawn, lets drag him out and beat him to death with Saddam's corpse.

Answer 10

Both dead. Saddam is dead thanks to a rope. He was young & would have murdered millions more. Bin Ladin may or may not be alive, but his health is poor & age is factor. Waste of a good rope in my opinion. Someone else has already taken his place & Saddam's organization collapized after his capture. I think Saddam was best to go 1st.

Answer 11

I would rather have Bin Ladin captured for all three. He orchestrated 9-11.