English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here are a number of articles that detail the deplorable lack of treatment and support for our troops that are returning from the wars in the ME, severely injured, both physically and mentally. With all the trillions being spent to fight these ******* wars, there is NO excuse for our soldiers being provided ANYTHING LESS than excellent medical care, support, and full benefits upon their return.

I will post the links and excerpts from the articles, but please take the time to read these articles in their entirety.

Soldiers Face Neglect, Frustration At Army's Top Medical Facility

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701172.html

2007-02-19 06:57:21 · 2 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1 in Politics & Government Military

2 answers

It is truly pathetic the way the are treated.

2007-02-19 12:34:49 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5 · 0 0

relies upon on what exaclty you're observing. I at tiems think of fredoms of speech could nicely be severe. i.e. Burning the flag should not be secure speach. people died for that flag. however the comparable courts forbit burning crosses? (I beleive burning crosses is incorrect, yet I even have confidence burning the flag is worse.) OTOH, with contributors of congress speaking on the subject of the "fairness act" we right here could be limiting unfastened talk way too some distance. besides, what's "honest" approximately limiting radio purely. You wnat actual fairness then you definitely could could prepare it to all media. additionally egregeiously incorrect in my concepts. definite going after radio purely makes it blatantly political which makes it some distance worse that a blanket concepts-set. there are various different examples in the two guidelines. in fact right this is my concept Freedom of speach is very fundamental to our equipment and could be secure. the place your speach starts off to harm others (in charge, slander etc) you would be limited. Labeling some media for grownup contenct violence and stuff is nice. limiting it previous smart age limits isn't. we could tolerate some speach we come across distasteful as though we don't freedoms could be limited lots farther than any persons could probably locate appropriate. purely a number of my concepts.

2016-12-17 13:53:48 · answer #2 · answered by donenfeld 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers