chemical weapons are part of that family as well. i just find it surprising that when i talk to people about the war in Iraq the first thing they say is well he didn't have any WMD'S. when in fact he did he was trying to get his scud operation back in order. and our troops have found mass stock piles of chemical weapons over there. so why aren't people being taught that wmd is not just a nuke ?
2007-02-19 06:25:24 · 12 answers · asked by ryan s 5 in Travel ➔ Italy ➔ Bologna
People who complain don't want to see, because they would have to change their outlook. And we can't have that. They only hear what they want to hear. And that is "Bush lied, people died."
Many WMD have been found in Iraq. Here are some links to several stories, and many of these were usable munitions.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38213
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2004/0604/061704-wmd.htm
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=13168
I could list more articles, but if these won't sway anyone, then nothing will, and they will continue to drink the Kool-Aid that they're being offered by the MSM and the looney-left.
2007-02-19 07:04:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam had WMDs in the 1980s and was using them against the Iranians and the US not only did protest the use of these posion/chemical gas WMDs they encouraged their use. Saddam's WMDs whether chemical, biological or nuclear were no threat to the US (Saddam didn't even use them against the US in the 1st Gulf War) but they were a major threat to Israel especially with his Scuds and that is why the US invaded Iraq. To save Israel from Saddam's WMDs.
2007-02-19 06:36:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not to mention that human beings turning airplanes into missles is WMD in my eyes. All the radical muslims ARE in fact part of the WMD
2007-02-19 06:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by baby1 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We gave them plenty of time to move the active weapons to Syria.So the ones we found were not usable , they used them in the past on their own people.The Iraqi government was guilty as charged , that's why Saddam was executed by his own people.
2007-02-19 06:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by shawnn 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, the commission that searched for years and the military since the commission was removed did not find any weapons that were being actively worked. The 'stockpiles' found were from the early 90s and unusable.
2007-02-19 06:32:03 · answer #5 · answered by words_smith_4u 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
To begine with the AK-47 has killed more people than all WMDs combined. So what is the real WMD????
Saddam wasn't developing WMD's,,,, he was building palaces!!!!!!
The only WMDs Iraq ever had were the ones we gave him, and he had already used them up.
2007-02-19 07:24:19 · answer #6 · answered by tom l 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I find it interesting that noone has bothered to point out why we knew there were w.m.d.'s in Iraq. We knew they had them because President Bush's hero (Ronald Reagan) supplied them to Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war. It is akin to me giving you a joint then calling the police to search you for drugs.
2007-02-19 06:55:14 · answer #7 · answered by the_ginslinger 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's a good question. I am sure if we asked the thousands of his own people that he killed with poison gas, they would consider that a weapon of mass destruction. Of course they can't be asked, they are dead.
2007-02-19 06:38:16 · answer #8 · answered by martinmagini 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
False, there were no mass stockpiles found and Iraq had no active WMD programs. Sorry, no WMD.
2007-02-19 06:32:38 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
you are correct-some people just refuse to accept the truth in this matter.
I also agree with baby1.
2007-02-19 06:44:29 · answer #10 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋