wot do u think about the war in iraq?

Answer 1

Personally speaking as a UK citizen I couldn't give a monkey's, but I DO feel sorry for the poor sods who get killed out there whilst fighting for or on behalf of the USA

Answer 2

Mindless cowardly Governments sending their Fearless Warriors to their deaths.

By supposedly giving Iraqi people their freedom, they are obliterating our way of life in our own Countries.

Hundreds of Iraqi civilians being killed every day by the insurgents in Iraq, just because we are there and the Iraqi civilians tolerate us.

Slaughter on the highest level will come the day we pull our troops out. Ethnic cleansing i think the insurgents call it.

People worry about a 3rd World War but i think while the USA travels the Globe putting pressure on other Countries this is going to be the only outcome in the end.
One day a Country will stand up and say NO, whether it be right or wrong, the USA will have no choice but to stand its ground and this is when the Nukes will fly.

IT IS INEVITABLE

Answer 3

It is an adventure by two madmen George Bush and Tony Blair to boost their own egos. They lied to their own people about weapons of mass destruction and then claimed they invaded Iraq to improve human rights. This is ignoring the fact that there are many countries with human rights abusess far worse than anything under Saddam. Iraq also has oil and this has gained the attentiuon of the greedy eyes of these two men. Working class American kids are dying along with innocent Iraqis f or NOTHING.Nothing is being achieved in Iraq, the world is also much more dangerous now than it was before the invasion

Answer 4

We should get out.

We are no longer wanted there.
(I'm not sure we ever were)

Bottom line, we are caught in the middle of a civil war now. Our troops are in harm's way everyday for nothing. I say leave, let them kill each other. The winner gets the US.

I mean seriously, we can bomb them back to the Stone Ages (not that long of a trip for them) whenever we want, so why get our guys killed in the interim?

Bush needs to admit this was a bad decision and cut our losses.

Just think if we had spent 365 Billion on developing alternative fuel sources, or ensuring healthcare for all Americans, or stopping illegal immigration....

Answer 5

Sadam had to go NO ? ABOUT IT . But there were other ways of doing this than going to war....They have been fighting in the Middle East since the begin of recorded history and will probaly never end.....But we are there now and need to support the troops and pray for a end to the madness

Answer 6

Saddam Hussein was not a danger to the region, and he was not a young man. In 12 years or so he would have died of old age, and the country would have plunged into a downward spiral of sectarianism, theocracy and general lawlessness. But then again it wouldn't cost us billions!

Answer 7

Listen to the British people and get out now, and furthermore stop selling weapons to any bidder just to keep the arms industry in production.
Do you ever hear of an armaments factory closing?

Answer 8

Lets face the facts, if we weren't in Iraq, alqueda would be here. They have a religious agenda. Politics is not what they fight for. We leave, they will not call an end to their "jihad!"
So lets leave the battle on their land.

Answer 9

The war was started with good and bad intentions, poorly executed, poorly planned. I'd give it a D-.

Answer 10

The first one was right. This one is BO££OCK$.
Bring all the troops home.
Send in Bu$h & B£iar.They are the only ones who think it's right.