2007-02-19 02:29:07 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
How about humans having toenails.
2007-02-19 02:42:07 · update #1
This is easy:
The human skeleton. The curvature in the human spine does not bear loads well over time and is subject to significant amounts of degenerative disease and displacement because of it. Also, the hip bones, especially in women. The opening between the bones is just not big enough for a baby to pass through, why is why women experience lots of complications, pain, tearing, etc often in pregnancy. Other species do not experience this to this extent. As a matter of interest, both these problems are due to the fact that humans walk upright; our skeleton has not yet modified enough to accomodate this chang in posture. Isn't evolution interesting?
2007-02-19 02:54:40 · answer #1 · answered by somebody 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i visit take the contrarian concepts-set and argue against most of the Christian arguments sure to be pronounced. Any organic and organic function would be chalked as much as Darwinian evolution. some say Darwinian evolution can no longer account for "irreducible complexity" yet they are incorrect. Darwinian evolution can produce irreducibly complicated structures. If organisms did no longer evolve, yet have been incredibly designed by ability of god himself, why is it that this point of complexity is barely exhibited by ability of organisms? Why are not there incredibly complicated artifacts that don't reproduce, that are actually not project to rationalization by ability of darwinian evolution? Why did God write the ten commandments on stone pills incredibly than pill computers? And the positive tuning argument is complete non-experience. If gravity have been ten circumstances greater desirable, or ten circumstances weaker, advantageous, the universe would be arranged in any different case, yet each and all of the climate and chemical ingredients would nevertheless behave an identical. Stars and planets would nevertheless variety, the only distinction would be the time scale and their hundreds, so there would nevertheless be planets able to beginning abiogenesis, they had only be in diverse places. exchange the cosmological constants, and you alter the universe, yet why does all people anticipate that's astronomically unlikely that someplace in that popular new universe a reproductive entity project to organic decision would emerge and that its descendants does no longer evolve into marginally clever entities posing an identical conceited supposition approximately their own circumstance.
2016-11-23 18:31:38 · answer #2 · answered by hirschfeld 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Britney Spears
2007-02-19 02:38:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo! Answers
2007-02-19 02:33:06 · answer #4 · answered by mzJakes 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Some of my first homework projects when I started taking Graphic Design classes - I look back at them now, and man, they're terrible!
2007-02-19 02:36:21 · answer #5 · answered by daisyk 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Crystal Pepsi.
2007-02-19 02:33:04 · answer #6 · answered by togashiyokuni2001 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Unintelligent design?
How about the space needle in Seattle? That sucker is just waiting to fall over.
May God be eternally praised..........
2007-02-19 02:32:45 · answer #7 · answered by primoa1970 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The human body-it's a disaster that no self respecting deity would ever design.
2007-02-19 02:33:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your teeth are in your mouth, not on your ears.
Your nose is not upsidedown.
Your nose is not under your arms.
Your feet face forward instead of backward.
Your fingers are on your hands, not your feet.
Just continue thinking about it. God designed the body wonderfully.
2007-02-19 02:36:28 · answer #9 · answered by tina 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If Jessica Simpson was actually God and did all the creating. That would be just dumb luck.
2007-02-19 02:35:22 · answer #10 · answered by lkrhtr70 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋