To capture & hang him in 2007
2007-02-19 01:10:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
What, some small agricultural loans & expertise, one helicopter that got misused therefore shot down, and a certain amount of intel? That's all there was, you know.
Surely you're not confused with the $10billion debt to USSR for MiGs, tanks, &c, or the debt to France for Mirage jets. Or that Kuwait was forced to pay annual Tribute, and when they refused were invaded. There is nothing "American" in that. Nothing.
That's the history and the facts.
2007-02-19 11:15:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We had hoped to gain our kidnapped Americans back from that Crazy Man who took then in Iran. An airline was hijacked and the head religious nut job from Iran was responsible.
2007-02-19 09:14:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mother 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
They hoped to fuel the war between Iraq and Iran so that Iraq could check Iran's influence, who were considered the biggest enemies of the day.
2007-02-19 09:10:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Runa 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
They were hoping to fight a war by proxy. And just like every time the US fights a proxy-war they screwed it up and ended up creating their own enemies. Just like Osama in Afghanistan and countless other times in the past. I've said it before on these pages, history is our best guide to the future.
2007-02-19 11:05:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by jezza 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Since we were not blessed with the foresight and knowledge of so many people on here, we made a bad choice. Sadaam was the lesser of two evils between Iran and Iraq. He looked good on paper and since none of the critics on here were able to lend their vast amount of knowledge, the Government erred.
2007-02-19 09:56:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jim R 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Protecting America's interests at that time. Hey, if you have the power via the wealth America has, you make the rules. No one said life was fair? He who has the wealth has the power that makes the rules.
2007-02-19 09:14:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Muga Wa Kabbz 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
That hewould help fight off communism, and after he had the right supples; he did along w/ other people like Osama
2007-02-19 09:19:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
to keep Iran occupied since they threw us out when the shaw went bye bye, we put the shaw in, then put saddem in, we dont chose very well do we?
2007-02-19 09:17:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
keep Iran in check.
2007-02-19 09:09:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by 007 4
·
3⤊
0⤋