English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

An article, Mission imperial, in Guardian UK has exposed the lifestyle for the Imperialistic 'rich and famous' in Iraq's Green Zone - indeed, seemingly more glorious than how evil Saddam and his playboy sons had lived!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2016264,00.html

It's no wonder Bush wants more American soldiers in Iraq to protect his and his friends' Imperialistic Fantasyland. It's no wonder that soldiers who serve in the Green Zone are willing to serve as poster boys and gals to support the Iraq War or demand to return to Iraq. it's no wonder the likes of Joe Lieberman , and those Zionist Repugs and Right Wing NeoCon media honkers speak of the Iraq progess - especially when they had dined at the cafeteria in the Green Zone's Republican Palace?? Food supplies sent to the Green Zone from Kuwait? Guess nations, like Kuwait, are making profits out of Iraq without having to send their Troops and money to fight the war. How cool.

2007-02-18 18:55:10 · 5 answers · asked by United_Peace 5 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

I must admit this is one of the silliest questions I have read so far. Look, America is not an Imperialistic country. If it was, it could easily have taken over the world after the second world war. I defy you to identify another country that has conquered so many other belligerent nations and then not taken them over but helped feed their populations and rebuild. We have massive terrible weapons that can take out any government on earth if we so choose. We choose not to do it. Yet fools still refer to the United States as imperialistic.

Has everyone in the UK forgotten WWII? Where would they be right now had there been no USA? An article in the U.K. Guardian (which would not even exist if not for America's military) and off you go making all kinds of wild accusations. You site food supplies from Kuwait like it is proof of some misdeed. Oh and by the way, your antisemitism is showing.

2007-02-18 23:53:33 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0 0

no one EVER sends troops into conflict to DIE troops are despatched into conflict TO KILL !! The moves interior of IRAQ were defined a number of diverse approaches because the starting up of all of this---opt for your widespread explaination for all of it--- because at this aspect in time that is each and each and every individual's wager !! And, that is the profitering interior of all of this that has dissimilar people completely disgusted with all of it ! someone would truly must be blind or figuring out on no longer to look no longer to make certain it !! The sadest testiment of all in it is that the "democracy" that we were informed we are meant to be bringing to IRAQ has wound up which means each and on a daily basis bloodbaths on the streets of basically about each and every city in the country at the same time as the "elite" cover in luxury bunkers completely except for all of it !! the persons at the instantaneous are free---- to die at any minute quite everywhere for no different reason than basically being the position they are !! outstanding aspect this new idea of freedom !!!

2016-12-04 08:57:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

And more troops will arrive soon. The sheep are so easy to push around.

2007-02-18 19:43:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2007-02-18 19:01:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A few too many if you ask me.

2007-02-18 19:02:14 · answer #5 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers