of them can barely write a sentence in English?
If you want to say yiour faith says
Do you really think you are going to disprove scientists with PHDs by asking why the moon doesn't have life?
2007-02-18 16:07:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think there is a misunderstanding....I am talking about creationists in Yahoo r and s.
I am specifically refering to a question that attempted to disprove evolution because there isn't life on the Moon or Mars.
Anne Coulter is literate? I'm not convinced of that one. She has a big mouth, that's about all I've seen.
2007-02-18 16:15:44 · update #1
Thomas Acquinas lived 500 years ago. LMAO....how exactly did he disprove evolution 500 years ago?
2007-02-18 16:32:29 · update #2
Science and religion need not be at odds. Scientists cannot prove anything about God because they cannot form a testable hypothesis about Him. Religious people need not fear inquiry into the natural world. God created the natural order, understanding it is a great thing.
2007-02-18 16:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by MikeD 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You should do some research before you open your mouth. And learn to write a sentence in English. There are many scientists that beleive in a God that created the universe, Thomas Aquinas was one of the smartest ment to ever live. And if you really think of it, there isn't any way for God to NOT have created the Universe.
Now, this doesn't mean evolution didn't happen, Even the Vatican studies it. It's just that God is the guiding force behind it.
Seriously, smart guy- If you're so smart, read the case for faith and disprove it.
Even better, Thomas Aquinas.
2007-02-19 00:27:50 · answer #2 · answered by Everything you know is wrong 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They do, because they do not know any better -- and, what is more important, refuse to learn. The opinions of a pile of scientists are not as important as that evolution is now a proven fact (details on request).
2007-02-19 00:11:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Creationists are the laughing stock of science. They try so
hard to sound intelligent and worthy of some scientific merit
but they know that their fairy tale is just not compatible with
scientific fact.
2007-02-19 00:12:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. They don't believe they have to argue anything because they have their own ready-made answer "The Bible says so."
Seems pretty lazy and pathetic to me, but then, I'm not a creationist.
2007-02-19 00:14:10 · answer #5 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually quite a few of them are quite literate in english; e.g. anne coulture. their problem is science and logic.
moon and life? they dont have anythg tio say about that.
scientists with phds that dont elegantly string sentences together exist. different skill types.
2007-02-19 00:12:57 · answer #6 · answered by rostov 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not saying I believe,but were you aware that there are scientists with PhD's who believe in creation?
2007-02-19 00:13:52 · answer #7 · answered by Serena 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think science just sheds light on how God did what he did.
2007-02-19 00:12:07 · answer #8 · answered by MeanKitty 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. It is unwise to argue against logic, you will always lose.
2007-02-19 00:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by skunkgrease 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋