Shouldn't they all be humane?
2007-02-18 13:57:51 · 17 answers · asked by Knightmare 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If there were no steel monkeys what would we make monkey wrenches from?
2007-02-18 14:02:01 · answer #1 · answered by Murazor 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This question is asked weekly. Many monkeys are humane, just not human. Humans didn't evolve from modern monkeys, we have a common ancestor. We grew and evolved together as siblings and cousins. The mutations and adaptations that made us human allowed us to have babies and the babies survived long enough to have more babies. The mutations and adaptations of our cousins allowed them to have babies and the babies survived to have more babies and though we were different, we coexisted. It's not like anyday now a chimp is going to give birth to a baby A. afarensis, it would just be a funny looking chimp. That funny looking chimp and some more like him might be really good at something that makes them better able to survive human's effect on the environment so they would have stronger babies etc, but there will be no chimp-boy.
2007-02-18 14:08:06 · answer #2 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Jack Russell Terriers evolved from Fox Terriers why are fox terriers still around. There is no doubt that the Reverend Jack Russell did create the Jack Russell terrier so obviously all of the fox terriers should have died according to your logic.
The monkeys that are around now also evolved from the monkeys which gave rise to mankind.
Nothing illogical or difficult about it.
2007-02-18 14:07:32 · answer #3 · answered by John B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they have evolved to the point that they have the ability to now make plate armor. Steel is their metal of choice. It is strong, and durable. They are preparing for a takeover of earth. They will not be humane, and will show no mercy. We should launch a strike on the termite mounds and banana fields to cut their food supply before it is too late.
2007-02-18 14:16:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
relies upon on the place you draw the line. The extra you bypass back, the extra species are descended from a similar ancestors as human beings, till you return to the single ancestor ALL life on earth is descended from. in case you opt for for to examine a e book which describes this ok, get "The ancestor's tale" via Richard Dawkins (who could be basically a sprint an overexcitable, sarcastic Brit whilst it includes faith, yet relatively is an staggering author whilst it includes evolution). *** "all of us stepped forward from a uncomplicated ancestor. approximately 14 million years in the past (uncertain if it relatively is exactly superb) there replaced right into a million form of 'monkey'. As Pangaea split into assorted Continents the a million species of 'monkey' replaced into separated into diverse terrains." that is allopatric evolution. yet... pangaea broke up a sprint longer than 14 million years in the past. Continental glide isn't THAT quickly.
2016-10-02 09:02:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mental illogic used by evolutionists is the only evidence I see that men's brains evolved from a monkey's.
2007-02-18 14:11:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they didn't like iron.
Once upon a time, long long ago there was a species that branched off into different sub species. These sub species evolved and separated from each other more, and their decedents are different species today, including humans. OUR group did all turn human. Other "monkeys" were not our group.
2007-02-18 14:02:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
seeing questions like this make me want to beat myself to death with a frying pan.
man did not evolve from monkeys.
we evolved from a creature that was a common ancestor of both man and the modern day Chimpanzee. (at least in evolutionary theory)
there are still chimps because they are cousins to man.
if your father had a brother and the brother ahd a wife and the wife had a child and that child grew up to have a child this would be your second cousin.
so if you exist then why do does your second cousin exist?
this is the arguement that you are making.
2007-02-18 14:05:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Thats easy ,,,
good example
why are babies still around if they grow into adults ?
why are 1950 something cars around if we have advanced models?
why are old computers still around if we have new models ?
why are electric chairs still used if we have lethal injection?
All things evolve .... evolveing is NOT the END of one thing it is the begining of a new one. Some things do not surrvive evolveing most do ....
2007-02-18 14:13:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL!
"Steel around" That's cute.
Send me an email through the link in my profile if you have questions, comments, or concerns.
2007-02-18 14:01:17 · answer #10 · answered by Seth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋