English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

yae or nae?

2007-02-18 12:52:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

8 answers

yae

2007-02-18 12:54:29 · answer #1 · answered by Cathy A 2 · 1 0

thanks for posting this question, I am not familiar with this particular case , but,I do know other prosecutors who are just as crooked as you depict this Johnny Sutton, and the sad fact is the public doesn't seem to believe it or really care,of course some are there to try and make this a better world, but, most are there to simple further their career and will go to any extreme to do so,for example the prosecutor in Illinois who sent 47 men to their death , and it was proven later he lied had the cops to lie and he knew some of these men were not guilty,and after a federal investigation proved 35 of these men were not guilty, yet he was not even censored, he is now states Attorney general,?????
if there is not going to be any justice in the justice dept, why the hell are we calling it the justice dept, and when we have a 98.8 %conviction ratio no one except the rich will ever get any justice,then we are back to JUSTICE you get how much you can pay for, and that is not American Justice , I do hope you will continue to publicize this injustice and maybe the American people will wake up and demand a change, please post any suggestions that others can do to help rid our country of scum like this.

2007-02-18 21:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Another Bush crony to add to the list of those indicted, convicted, or under investigation. This Border Patrol Scandal stinks to high heaven and Lou Dobbs can't get enough Kudo's for making light of this incomprehensible situation.


I think he was protecting the delivery of Bush's personal stash. Note how the controversy goes above and beyond Sutton.

2007-02-18 21:04:26 · answer #3 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1 1

Si, Senor. El es un puta grande!

Via con Dios!

But really, some one is going to report you if you keep posting the same question. I agree with you on this, I am just telling you.

2007-02-18 21:04:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nae.

2007-02-18 20:54:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Sutton should be in prison!

2007-02-18 20:55:49 · answer #6 · answered by Dizney 5 · 0 0

yes

2007-02-22 14:29:13 · answer #7 · answered by Kbear 4 · 0 0

Yae.

For those who don't know.

We are still closely watching the Border Patrol case, especially after last week’s explosive news that the DHS had lied to Congressmen who were looking into the case. Close on the heels of that shocking revelation, we noted that US Attorney Johnny Sutton, the prosecutor in this case, has lied openly and repeatedly about this case to the media. In an effort to counter Sutton’s lies, here is one of his favorite public statements about Border Patrol agents Ramos and Compean deconstructed:

“These guys did very serious crimes and once anybody who knows all the facts of this case — the fact that they shot at an unarmed guy 15 times, lied about it, covered it up, destroyed the evidence … it’s hard for me to imagine a prosecutor would look the other way,” he said.


1. It has not been proven that the drug smuggler was unarmed. Sutton has been unable to prove it, yet he states it like it’s a fact. Furthermore, two of the drug smuggler’s own family members have made statements that he has been running drugs since he was 13 or 14 and has never smuggled drugs without being armed.

2. Compean and Ramos DID NOT LIE about shooting the drug smuggler. They didn’t know that they had until almost a month later! And it’s still not proven that Ramos is the one who shot the drug smuggler.

3. The DID NOT try to “cover it up”. They verbally reported to their superiors that they fired their weapons.

4. They DID NOT destroy evidence. Sutton has been harping on this because he claims that the site of the shooting was a “crime scene” and that the BP agents knowingly altered the scene of the crime by picking up their shell casings. That is FALSE. The agents, including the agents that were with them at the time of the shooting, did NOT designate the area a crime scene, since they did NOT know that the drug smuggler had been shot.

5. In fact, far from lying about the incident or “covering it up”, Ramos and Compean followed procedures exactly.

6. On Saturday, it was further revealed that two of the Border Patrol agents that had testified on behalf of the prosecution against Ramos and Compean also lied in their testimony during the trial.

Two Border Patrol agents who testified against two co-workers convicted of shooting a drug smuggler will be fired for changing their stories about events surrounding the shooting, according to documents obtained by the Daily Bulletin.

Sources inside the Border Patrol also say Oscar Juarez, a third agent who testified against Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, resigned from the agency last month shortly before he was to be fired.

All three agents gave sworn testimony against Ramos and Compean for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, which successfully prosecuted the shooting case in March. The agents were given immunity in exchange for their testimony despite changing their accounts of the incident several

“When you give deals to witnesses like immunity, the government usually gets the testimony (it wants),” said Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, a former judge and prosecutor. “This case is a perfect example.”

What else is Johnny Sutton up to, besides being a bald-faced liar and coercing others to lie? As we’ve already reported in our previous coverage, he’s an over-zealous prosecutor of American law enforcement officers who are doing their best to protect America and themselves from coyotes, drug smugglers, and the other criminals turning our borders into a war zone. Ramos and Compean are not Sutton’s only victims.

Furthermore, those same illegals LIED about Hernandez shooting at them after they crashed their vehicle and fled on foot:

Sheriff Letsinger also said the Rangers and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) agents, using dogs and metal detectors, found four shell casings at the traffic stop site but none at the crash site — discounting claims by two of the vehicle’s occupants that Hernandez fired shots at them as they fled the vehicle.

Nevertheless, Sutton treated the testimony of illegals already proven to be liars as inviolable, while painting Hernandez as a “rogue cop” (sound familiar?) and has imprisoned Hernandez for doing his job. But it doesn’t stop there. Sutton has a very dirty track record. In 2004, in an effort to protect one of his star witnesses - a Mexican informant - he covered up the informant’s participation in 15 tortures and murders at the “House of Death” in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico.

Apparently, no crime is too vile for Sutton when it comes to protecting his informants. Just as he protected the notorious drug smuggler Aldrete-Davila and provided whim with taxpayer funded benefits such as a vehicle and a green card, so he has previously protected and paid off an informant that he KNOWS is a mass murderer. In fact, Sutton’s office has gone to great lengths to conceal the heinous crimes of their informant and have moved him frequently to keep him away from other American law enforcement agencies, such as the DEA. Furthermore, Sutton has been involved in making huge payments in “hush money” to this informant - over $50,000 - which was disguised as a payment to a different informant who was already dead. Now Sutton has gone to his high-level contacts inside the Department of Justice (I’ve previously revealed his insider connections with Alberto Gonzales and George Bush) in order to shut down a DEA officer who is brought serious charges against Sutton for his complicity in covering up torture and murder.

All the details of the above case are presented here. There is no crime to vile - not drug smuggling, not torture, and not mass murder - for U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton to overlook in order to further his career. How many lives does he get to destroy with impunity before he’s held accountable? U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton is a despicable and incredibly corrupt individual. And because of his long-held and close ties with President George W. Bush, and U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and other high-ranking Texas politicians in D.C., Johnny Sutton gets a free pass for crimes that would put any other American into prison for the rest of their lives! Who is paying Johnny Sutton for his crimes?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2007-02-18 21:01:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers