English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

I have passing familiarity with a few of them.

Which do you have in mind?

Hoaxes tell us nothing about the general truth of evolution; there's an abundance of solid, well-verified evidence from a variety of fields supporting it.

So what are you asking about?

2007-02-18 14:51:56 · answer #1 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0 0

I think that people will believe what they have decided to believe, whatever the evidence tells them. If they find that the evidence runs counter to their beliefs, they call the evidence fake and a hoax. If it runs along with their beliefs they call it true and logical.

Most people have made up their minds what they believe by the time they have reached the age of 14, and only a few keep searching beyond that.

2007-02-18 18:15:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The good thing about science is it is able to throw out the hoaxes and move on. A few hoaxes do not discredit the other mountains of evidence. Even when some things are not hoaxes but just previously misinterpreted they are able to adjust to that. That is the good thing about science - it is always learning and improving - not just static and inflexible.

2007-02-18 19:02:14 · answer #3 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 0 0

Fully am aware of many of them and that is 1 of many many reasons that made me go from atheist to full blown believer.

There are more fake items than real items. Great example is the last skull they found saying "we found the missing link!!". Yeah, some missing link....3 separate skulls super glued together. Yeah....we paid this guy how much and gave him how much to dig in the dirt to give us a lie?

Science is created by man, man is not perfect, so in logic sense, mans science cannot be perfect either.

2007-02-18 18:07:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Scientific hoaxes are uncovered by science.

2007-02-18 18:07:57 · answer #5 · answered by October 7 · 0 0

like the lockness monster Crowley might have involved in

2007-02-18 18:06:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No.

2007-02-18 18:07:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers