thoughts please?

Question

someone just posted this link in regards to Pharoes chariot remains being found in the Red sea
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/images/wpe2E1.jpg
does this look like 2000 year old metal .... seriously now
thoughts please

this seems to be from a museum judging from the link , but i cant find the main link page

Answer 1

looks fake to me did you try googling wyattmuseum?

i can't comprehend why people feel the need to prove stuff just to see the truth in it. as a jew, i would rather admit that the story is partly myth, or at least unprovable, and go back to the more important matter of why this story was included in my torah and what i can learn from it. stuff like that just hurts my feelings, like their making fun of it by trying to fake proof that it happened. i don't know how to explain what i want to say. it's kinda sad actually.

edit: googled it - got some guy named ron wyatt who says he found noah's ark as well. from what i saw on the first page, he has singlehandedly been the one lucky enough to discover archealogical proof for nearly every event in bibilical history. and he runs a gift shop so that you too can have a piece of history! i feel as nasty email to his contact page coming on. what a mean phony!

Answer 2

it is still shiny. that means that it has not corroded. that means that it is either Aluminum or stainless steel.and it seems to have only 4 spokes. oh and there is the simple fact that most wheels were made of wood at that time. i guess that the Pharaoh could afford some "bling" for his chariot, but even he was not rich enough to buy stuff that had not been invented yet.

besides even if it was a chariot wheel form that age, if you stop , to think about the very simple mechanics of what happens to tires when they get into saturated ground. the idea that any of their chariots made it more than a few hundred feet into the sea bed is absurd. they would have been mired in mud and sand.

a better explanation is chariots being repaired while on ships crossing the red sea, and broken parts being thrown overboard.
or chariots being transported and ships capsizing and dumping them to the sea floor.. these would explain chariot parts being in defined lines acrost the sea floor because the ships would have followed a defined route.

I believe in all religions, bur as far as proof goes of moses splitting the sea, this is a very weak attempt at evidence. way to easy to explain.

why do people that claim faith, always seem to seek proof?

Answer 3

As I see from this picture it looks like stainless steel, my thoughts are just from the picture no, not 2000+ yrs old. But once in a lab, with a completed investigation, I hope the truth will be told, either way.
I thought scholars already found all the evidence - on History channel, about the Exodus.
The Red Sea is totally wrong area for the event, according to the show, and it's scholars.

Answer 4

from what it looks like it doesn't seem very old i didn't know they used metal for their chariots either , but i guess it is possible plus they could have cleaned it upor changed the photo to fake it or the whole thing could be a fraud not saying it is but things like that have happened that would REALLY amazing if it were really from a chariot it could also be from something else even if it is old - don't jump to conclusions where was this website, with the info?
I found the web quite interesting guess it is true looking at the other pics the probably cleaned the metal, or did some photo work to show where they were looking
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/red-sea-crossing-04.htm
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/red-sea-crossing-05.htm
also to include we do have proof that such things happened that is the bible people are right we don't really NEED more physical proof, but we have it anyway

Answer 5

It has already been shown that the red sea has parted prior to a tsunami, the ancient Egyptians lived in the bronze age and bronze doe not corrode iron was discovered by the Hittites who defeated the Egyptians with their much Superior weapons.It is also a proved geological fact that the flood took place.

Answer 6

The thing round it looks like some sort of support marker for it. It looks like the remains part may be the lumpy bit in the middle. That seems more likely. Although I wouldn't trust any pictures off the internet willy nilly.

Answer 7

Not sure but i think people are looking at the bright metal circle that looks like it has been put inplace to mark out and protect the bit in the middle

Answer 8

To get to the main page, you just take the end off the image url in the address bar:

http://www.wyattmuseum.com/

Answer 9

That could be anything but I'd guess it's NOT a 2000 year old wheel.

Answer 10

Ron Wyatt planted the wheel himself, according to his son.
http://www.tentmaker.org/Dew/Dew7/D7-AGreatChristianScam.html