Is clear cutting a forest more or less destructive than a forest fire?

Question

Please provide reasons why, please

Answer 1

Clear cutting is more destructive than forest fire. Fire is actually natures way of maintain a natural balance, removing dead vegetation to give new healthy vegetation room to grow, there are even some seeds that need the heat of the fire to be able to grow. It also nature's way of keeping the over population of animals. Clear cutting forests throws this natural balance off and can cause the harm and destruction of the ecosystem. There are fuel breaks that fire departments will cut. These are in areas populated by people and they are used to help firefighters reduce the risk of forest fires burning homes, alot of care goes into these cuts, biologists are included in the process and they have the final say on what can be cut and what can't. Fuel breaks are usually done by removing dead trees and trees that appear less healthy, it also includes reducing crowding of trees; this actually helps to improve the health of trees and plants by reducing the overcrowding.

Answer 2

Forest fires occur when a forest has reached its peaked evolved life. At that point vegetation becomes very dry and lighting strike would find it easier to incendiate the forest. The remains of a forest fire is not counterproductive.Because of the carbon left on the ground and other substances the soil becoms more furtile a lays the ground work for a new forest.

This forest rebuilding can also be achievd by cutting down the old forest ,and using the wood, and then replanting anew.

As far as detroying a forest for other purposes it would be detrimental as forest affect the weather.

Answer 3

From Wikipedia:

Wildfire:
Today it is accepted that wildfires are a natural part of the ecosystem of wildlands, where, at the least, plants have evolved to survive fires by a variety of strategies (from possessing reserve shoots that sprout after a fire, to fire-resistant seeds), or even encourage fire (for example eucalypts contain flammable oils in the leaves) as a way to eliminate competition from less fire-tolerant species. In 2004, researchers discovered that exposure to smoke from burning plants actually promotes germination in other types of plants by inducing the production of the chemical butenolide. Most native animals, too, are adept at surviving wildfires.


Clearcut:
The most common and most criticized method of timber harvest in industrial operations is clearcutting. Clearcutting is criticized because, like any logging operation, it can expose bare mineral soils. This results in higher erosion rates than in a selection cut or multi aged stand management. Perhaps it is because clearcutting is a cheaper way to harvest trees that the public associates it with destructive practices and a lack of long term management. Images taken directly after a clear cut are often used politically because they can be used to imply that the area is not managed for regeneration. But it is undeniably true that clearcutting has a strongly negative visual impact. The impact of periodic clearcutting on a viewshed can reduce their value for housing or nearby recreation.


From this information, I would deduce that a clearcut is more destructive to a forest ecosystem. A wildfire being a natural event that forests have evolved into their survival strategies. Clearcutting on the other hand , leaves forest soils exposed and vulnarable to erosion, which causes longterm ecosystem destruction.

Answer 4

Clear cutting a Forrest is more destructive. It leaves the fragile top soil exposed and subject to erosion so that it becomes difficult to reforest.
A Forrest fire deposits the nutrients of the burned vegetation which enriches the top soil. It also aids many seeds in germination as these require intense conditions to start the process. The burned matter produces phosphorus necessary to the flowering stage of plants.

Answer 5

clear cutting is more destructive. at least in a fire the forest naturally grows better because if it.

Answer 6

Wild fires would be valuable to the wooded area and the atmosphere. that is been shown that particular trees (redwoods for one) won't sprout and enhance devoid of hearth. nicely controlled forests and logging can thrive extremely nicely jointly while the wooded area is replanted with as many, much greater trees than have been shrink down. It will become a renewable source. Weyerhauser is one business enterprise that does this. they have information superhighway pages that specify the approach they use. In appropriate perspective neither ought to be unfavourable. yet fires and logging can the two be unfavourable if allowed to run rampant.

Answer 7

Less Destructive

Answer 8

More destructive. Some pine cones won't open up and spread seeds unless they are exposed to extreme temperatures.