2007-02-18 06:06:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They absolutely can be an implosion from asstards taking this question seriously.
2007-02-19 09:49:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Subject could never hold itself as the Object (ie., God could never believe in God).
The Subject "wills" itself outward, much like the sun shines it's light outwards, and the inherent non-knowledge of reality forms beings into existence to search for the truth (the light of God).
But what is important is that this inherent non-knowledge is not nothing, because nothing comes from nothing, so a being, or anything for that matter, could not come from nothing. But the primordial state of consciousness comes about through its experience of suffering and it's knowledge of a state free from suffering. So often man concludes that a "state of nothing" is this freedom from suffering, and although it is the anilihation of the self (in your words, implosion) it is still not a reasonable solution to the problem of life itself and the inevitabile truth that life will continue on (i.e. the Self willing itself towards an object of consciousness, or in other words, creation).
2007-02-18 14:14:03 · answer #2 · answered by Julian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are trying to point out the absurdity of the trinity doctrine, I can understand your question. The trinity distorts the identity of God and Jesus.
The trinity doctrine conjures up lots of strange thoughts. For example, if Jesus is the Son of God and God at the same time, that would make him his own Father. Or his own Son. Since the Bible says God cannot die, how could Jesus die and not really be dead?
The trinity is not a Bible teaching. It is a man-made falsehood.
2007-02-18 14:17:07 · answer #3 · answered by LineDancer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Every man has to be born - again, born of the spirit of God in order to spend eternal life with God in heaven. This is in order to show that we accept and recognise what the Lord did for us on the cross of calvary. We were lost and living in sin without God, and seperated from God - but God in his infinite mercy and loving kindness sent his only begotten son to die for us.
Jesus Christ himself does not need to be washed in his blood to obtain favour from God since he never sinned. Though he was partly human, yet he was sinless. No one else has been declared sinless, but Jesus alone. We, Christians are righteous (sinless) in God's sight by the grace of God through the blood of Christ Jesus.
2007-02-18 14:32:05 · answer #4 · answered by RealArsenalFan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess you think you're really sneaky by posing these kinds of questions... The Christian belief is that Jesus IS everything good and divine. By definition, he IS the kingdom of heaven. Your semantic twist does not change that belief.
2007-02-18 14:10:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
he was born by a virgin, not by a man but the son of God. he never sinned on earth. he had perfect blood and was not of the flesh. so he died on the cross for our sins
2007-02-18 14:29:52 · answer #6 · answered by mosslandry 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the end of all things , the Jesus theory.
2007-02-18 14:11:14 · answer #7 · answered by black market dentistry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was perfect and still is..
2007-02-18 14:13:30 · answer #8 · answered by karen_03625 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋