Please tell me what you think....
Cannon or Kodak, and explain which is better and why?
2007-02-18 02:40:24 · 5 answers · asked by Mandi R 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
Powershot s21s
2007-02-18 02:53:19 · update #1
Canon is the best, but not the cheapest. My wife has a 6 year old s200 that still works excellent. I have a 6 year old Rebel 2000 35mm that is excellent. I have a 6 mos. old A700 that I like so much that I don't use the 35mm any more. My wife had a 2 year old Kodak digital that is now garbage, ditto my son. Kodak is cheaper for cameras with comparable specs, but YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.
2007-02-18 06:30:16 · answer #1 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the camera. Cannon is a major brand with pros. Kodak is not. I use Nikon only myself. It's not always a matter of better, but a matter of choice.
2007-02-18 02:50:24 · answer #2 · answered by Smelly Cat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
(It's "Canon".)
Good for what?
Yes, Canon is a good camera. In a certain category, for certain features, at a certain price point, you might prefer a Kodak.
The best thing to do is perform a comparison based on your preferences and then read some reviews. A good place to do this http://www.dpreview.com/
2007-02-18 02:55:04 · answer #3 · answered by mattzcoz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
canon is a good camera at a good price i have one myself the cameras have good quality pictures and they are also very easy to use. It's also very easy to copy pictures from the camera to your pc.
2007-02-18 02:44:55 · answer #4 · answered by Keyur Patel 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is good camera in my opinion
2007-02-18 02:45:54 · answer #5 · answered by srujan surajn_reddy136@yahoo.com 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋