level the playing field. survival of the fitest prevails. If your particular culture fails to get on or is under exposed in society, tough!
These Islands are British first, and British customs and traditions should prevail above all others!
2007-02-18 10:02:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Multiculturalism has never worked for any society and it is not working now. Nor will it ever work. We need to go back to being a nation of citizens ,all with the same allegiance to our own nations flag. One flag.The major language of the nation being made the official language .
Encourage and help others to learn to speak the dominate language . One can speak whatever language they desire but business and government must be in the dominate language of the nation.
Adapt and respect the customs and people of that country but you don't have to abandon your own customs, just look beyond your own. .You can only have loyalty and allegiance to one nation and one government.Not two.Liberals are trying to destroy
the US and are almost
to the point of succeeding.
History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way, "The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon-all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons and Corsicans."
2007-02-18 02:44:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
----a million. would you hear to an atheist radio software? (Or, possibly you already do?) i'd. i've got tried listening to some podcasts yet misplaced activity because of the fact it wasn't very staggering. i ought to have study it in much less time. ----2. What would you be maximum drawn to listening to / listening to approximately? (centred visitor audio device, data re: events, track, and so on?) i admire listening to approximately something if that is provided in an staggering and informative way. present day political events, philosophy, and literature that relate to atheism activity me. Ridiculing faith would be redundant, so possibly shrink that to a Friday humor sort of ingredient, in case you do it in any respect. ----3. Do you experience that this variety of teach must be syndicated? In different words, do you think of there is adequate purpose audience? i think of it might in all probability paintings nicely as a podcast. it might by no ability air the place I stay (U.S. Bible Belt). possibly it might stay to tell the story in greater desirable cities, yet i do no longer incredibly know something approximately no count if or no longer courses would stay to tell the story.
2016-11-23 16:29:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by klingbeill 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Multi-culturism depends on people of all creeds and colour,respecting the beliefs of other creeds and colour. Also that the law applies to all and is a not a pick and mix.
2007-02-18 01:36:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not everyone wants to look like a mongrel dog or a sick looking bush slime face,disgusting stink meat face.
2007-02-18 02:02:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by bruce j 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
It doesn't work because like everything else that doesn't work, its shrouded in liberalism.
2007-02-18 02:41:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I were you I'd get out more, it certainly works around here!
2007-02-18 07:58:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋