would'nt we see evidence of him somewhere in the Y! Answers comment fossil records?
2007-02-17 21:44:52 · 11 answers · asked by George Bailey 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
excuse me.. i am real
2007-02-17 21:49:23 · answer #1 · answered by Bad Church Lady 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There are plenty of fossil records for homnids dating back 5 million years.
Creationists just choose to ignore it all, claim it's one big hoax, and rely instead on a book written and rewritten over and over and over by men in power through the ages.
2007-02-18 05:57:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will always be a missing link, it does not matter how much we have found. Every time there is a link found, creationist will say what about the one in between this one and that one. We would have to have billions of fossils, and then it still would not be enough.
2007-02-18 05:47:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The funny thing about "A" missing link is that there isn't one, it's a progression over thousands of years, so it's not like there's just one change that links the species. This misnomer has created a bit of confusion.
2007-02-18 05:48:30 · answer #4 · answered by SDTerp 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Goerge there is no missing link and there never will be,this is one of the greatest lies regarding evolution to date, fossil records are never going to uphold Darwin and the modern atheistic scientest.
2007-02-18 05:50:11 · answer #5 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Missing link was found a long time ago. Here is a small list of the many found:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
2007-02-18 06:05:03 · answer #6 · answered by Alucard 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because they progression that took millions of years.. get your dumb *** go to school and get an education...you creationists are really fukking hopeless!!! you fail to realize that the bible is a lie and the truth is out there if your wiling to look for it but if not you can believe anything you want is that what religion is all about these days!!!
2007-02-18 06:03:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The scientific name is" inexistent link", because it doesn t exist.
2007-02-18 06:08:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
But, dear, there IS a missing link:
http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=Augd4v1_A.LEpGuSaSO0RWTd7BR.?show=NGdtd8TVaa
2007-02-18 05:50:03 · answer #9 · answered by DBA GODZY 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/deception.html
2007-02-18 05:48:41 · answer #10 · answered by Linda 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋