ESPN coverage of busch race?

Question

I was dissapointed.
comuntaters sucked.
I like Speed coverage.
I like Fox.
espn did not even come close to giving a race justice

Answer 1

blame the france family for the high cost of the tv rights. espn was better than nbc, that's for sure, but they weren't as good as they used to be. back when they took nascar and made it what it is, they were the best at covering the races. now they will have to cram in as much as they can to cover their costs for the rights to broadcast the races.

Answer 2

I liked it. One the commercials well there was hardly any commercials. Which makes it better race coverage. I like fox and that but I never cared for TNT/NBC, But I like Benny Parson though. He was the only commintator that I liked from that coverage. But Today I liked the ESPN2 Coverage of the race. They spent more time on many other the driver not just the top five. So the coverage was good.

Answer 3

I thought they did a good job they will get better as the season goes. I will say during a commercial, Nascar needs to wise up and use the split screen. Also need to tell us who was in the wreck, and everyone involved. I suspect that they will get better as time goes on.

Answer 4

It was they're first race of the season, they'll get better. Speed has actually been a little rusty this past week, but it's understandable. It all beats the hell out of NBC, they sucked.

Answer 5

Boy oh BOY do they need help.
Dr Jerry Punch to ESPN Broadcast Booth STAT!

Answer 6

Anything but Larry MacReynolds!!!! This guy never shut up. He prattles on endlessly about absolute drivel. Who gives a crap about the "lucky dog". The races are hoky enough without him sensationalizing bullsh*t.

Answer 7

they need help.Dr Jerry Punch to ESPN Broadcast Booth STAT!