Why do some people beleive capital punishment aka the death penalty is unconstutional?

Question

Prop 1 It is written a man has the right to bear arms
Prop 2 A man has to be alive in order to bear his arms
Prop 3 The definition of "to bear" Bear meaning self defense
Prop 4 If you kill a man or woman you take away his right to bear arms in any matter applicable and or imaginable

Conclusion: Therefore the death penalty is unconstitional

Answer 1

I am sorry , but the context of your question and subsequent defense thereof is completely inaccurate, false, far off base, totally incorrect and a conclusion that is not cohesive or coherent. Your argument of Capital Punishment vrs. the second amendment is not even in the same legal argument realm. Nice try though

Answer 2

enable's handle info, please. The U.S. shape has 2 amendments that would desire to be interpreted to make the death penalty unlawful. the 1st is the 8th modification, which prohibits cruel and extraordinary punishments. people who factor to this one often say that putting somebody to death, enormously after making them think of roughly it for years mutually as their situations bypass for the duration of the courts, is cruel. Others factor to the plenty greater fluid 9th modification, which covers rights no longer incredibly mentioned someplace else interior the form (I advise you study it in case you haven't got self assurance me). Madison located that one interior the bill of Rights to get carry of "rights interior the considered necessary variety" against government. it may be straight forward to argue that there is an absolute extraordinary from the 9th modification to no longer be killed via government for a criminal offense. This extraordinary would look like the 5th or 14th modification, yet no longer enable government to eliminate existence after due technique grow to be given. additionally, this question did no longer specify which shape. Many state constitutions incredibly disallow the death penalty. And in others, that's going to yet for the conservative interpretations of the splendid courtroom of that state. i'm questioning of states like Indiana, the place the state shape says the penal code is to be reformative, no longer in line with vindictive justice. Killing a guy or woman does not reform or restoration them. So in states like Indiana, the courts can purely placed on blinders in prefer of the death penalty and get their own constitutions incorrect.

Answer 3

LOL, the moment you kill someone, you lose all rights you have as an American citizen thus you can't vote or anything so ergo, the death penalty is constitutional.

Answer 4

As the great comedian Ron White said..."If you kill someone in Texas....we will kill you back."