What do you think it is more reasonable that the necessary eternal is,non intelligent matter or intellect?

Question

Please explain why

I must be honest in saying that if you do not understand what I am saying that is fine, but then you should never ever dare to present an opinion about matters of theism or atheism. That being said, the necessary eternal should be obvious to any person who has invested thought, otherwise it is describing colors to the blind

Let me also add that what I am asking is not some great mystery known only to the intelligent, no it is available to anybody who invests time and thought into these subjects of thought, and I know not everyone cares enough about it, though they should.I am saying that if you think about life and the fact of existence, you should understand with some reflection that something is necessarliy eternal, which all other things are built upon or in, in very general terms. When I say one cannot comment on this if they do not know,it is because you have not thought it through vigorously enough yet to see where others are mistaken and so have no basis to decide what is right or wrong

Answer 1

I think that just as the fact that there is something, proves that theres not complete nothing, that the fact there is intelligence, proves that there can't be infinite non-intelligence.

Answer 2

What necessary eternal?

NEXT DAY:
Having read your additional details I can only say that you have an unjustifiably high opinion of your own intellectual power. You believe that the most important event that ever happened in human history was when a man was nailed to a piece of wood. You believe that this man's mother was a virgin when she gave birth to him and that after he died he came back to life and floated up to the sky in a blaze of light. That to me does not constitute thinking things through "vigorously".

Answer 3

It could not possibly be either. Matter cannot exist unless it is defined by the existence of separate space and at least one "other" object; intellect cannot exist without subject/object dichotomy. Neither division can persist forever without some reunion (even if it is temporary); and therefore, neither matter nor intellect can be eternal.

Answer 4

I first saw your question and thought "what? that makes no sense" then, thinking you were just some loon, opened and worked in some other windows. On a whim I refreshed this window after a while and saw your 'enhanced' explanation.

Now I know you are a loon. Time for your lithium!

Answer 5

It reasonable to think that the eternal is necessary, intelligent matter will come to this conclusion.

Answer 6

Erm, maybe I am just misreading your question, or perhaps I am just unfortunately not greatly intelligent, but I dont get what it is you are asking, sorry!

Answer 7

I don't know about you, but my body is fearfully and wonderfully made. The intellect that it took to create the human body is beyond my comprehension.

Answer 8

I have NO clue what the heck you are trying to ask.