English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-16 20:54:14 · 12 answers · asked by slimdougy 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

12 answers

of course. but it depends on the situation, it does not mean that u should jump into bed at once. people need time to get know each other to realize what is better for them and if it feels right they even can jump to the bed at once)) it is very individual.
i mean sex is not the most important com ponent of love, but one of its manifestations and aspects and if u have long relationships, it is impossible without sex.

2007-02-16 20:59:14 · answer #1 · answered by saxa 5 · 0 0

I can't believe all of these answers! Of course it isn't! Love and sex are very different things and I was very in love with my fiance for two years before we ever had sex. Sex without love is incomplete. Love is trust and caring for another person. Sex is a beautiful thing, but loving someone and being able to not have sex is even more so.

2007-02-16 21:04:47 · answer #2 · answered by firefly 1 · 1 0

Not in my opinion. There are many reasons why sex might not be in a relationship and you can love someone without having to have sex.

Good Luck

2007-02-16 20:58:51 · answer #3 · answered by clbinmo 6 · 0 0

Oh yes, I've never had love without sex.

2007-02-16 20:58:38 · answer #4 · answered by to hot to handle 1 · 0 0

it is OK to love and not have sex sex is part of a relationship but if you love that person make the sex mien some thing so it will last

2007-02-16 21:01:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes and no. but if you love some one so much the sex is a give me

2007-02-16 21:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Q 1 · 0 0

Yes but, I would rather have sex without love! LOL

2007-02-16 20:57:23 · answer #7 · answered by Fireman T 6 · 0 1

Yes. Unless it's parent/child love.

2007-02-16 20:58:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i'm going to anticipate we are speaking a pair of romantic relationship... i'd say no. there are people who proceed to love and have sturdy relationships jointly while they don't have intercourse, like while one companion will become incapable for regardless of reason actual or emotional. i think of intercourse is crucial device to speak and exhibit your love, yet I dont think of that's needed once you have a bond you have a bond and that's greater significant than intercourse. intercourse is efficacious in my opinion, intercourse is significant , yet i've got self assurance that love is greater desirable than intercourse. intercourse doesnt could be approximately love in any respect, yet while used as a device of love that's amazingly effective regardless of the undeniable fact that it remains only a device, love can stay to tell the story devoid of it. now, while the two companions are in a position and one desires intercourse and the different only doesnt, it ought to reason issues in a relationship yet i've got self assurance they might for the main section, be labored out. sexual desires are some thing that ought to be dealt with, and sexual matters I admit would be very damageing to a relationship yet i've got self assurance it incredibly is unquestionably because of the fact one companion would experience rejected , harm by ability of the others disinterest they might experience unloved and undesired, yet while human beings can locate team spirit with eachother and paintings this out, then the relationship will only be greater desirable for having triumph over theese hindrances. regardless of the reality that, on occasion human beings locate they are mismatched and suited greater valuable for a diverse sort of love incredibly than a romantic relationship, and one sign of it incredibly is conflicting sexual desires, yet i've got self assurance that love is greater desirable than intercourse and that a pair does no longer prefer it to stay to tell the story, jointly as I renowned that intercourse is crucial ingredient

2016-11-23 14:37:25 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, sex is too important.

2007-02-17 02:00:55 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers