English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

*critically examined
*lessons learned

2007-02-16 19:26:50 · 5 answers · asked by micah s 1 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

The strategy, ..after faking a " terrorist " attack on the twin towers, and not the first time "they" did this, (see site below) was to get the American people behind them so they could attack Iraq,...get the oil, and set up " their" democratic (dictatorship) there and build strong military bases for the purpose of taking over and controling the middle east. All to enhance at last their last steps for a new world order. And this is not the U.S. peoples doings,..it's the puppets in charge of the white house working for the unseen extremely rich few families , who own the banks, the media, the medical association, the churches, and on and on and on. Fortunately, we have a great number of wonderful people trying to change this right now. Even public awareness will help in making this powerfully needed change. Mankind has been misled , lied to, kept in the dark for eons. In this most important time in the history of mankind, there is an awakening going on...

2007-02-16 19:56:57 · answer #1 · answered by goddess 1 · 0 0

1 We train our soldiers to dominate the situation, that treating people with any respect will get them killed.

2 We teach them to act instantly to any threat as soon as it is so much as imagined, and to act instantly without thought, as anything else will get them killed.

3 We teach them that even a less than one percent chance of danger will be the one time that gets them killed.

4 We don't teach them that that guarantees that the other 99+% of the time they will have killed an innocent civilian.

5 In order to allow the soldier to kill instantly, without hesitation, we instill deep bigotry, that all potential targets are less than human, unworthy of consideration.

6 We tell the soldier that if they think a shot comes from an apartment complex, even if there is only one shooter, everyone in the complex knows and approves, so taking out the complex is justified, even if you were wrong about there being a shooter there (see # 2 & 3)

Then we send them over to win the hearts and minds of these people, making sure we are only killing folk who hate us.

If there are any signs that this is not working, send 50,000 more troops and tell them to ratchet all that up a few notches.

If you don't like the "We" part of this, copy it and send it to your Congresscritter and tell him you want to opt out.

2007-02-16 20:53:24 · answer #2 · answered by Dragon 4 · 0 0

conflict and funds... no correlation. conflict... is a gross sales booster. that is been so... because of the fact the middle a while. England became into popular for it. u.s. is conventional for perfecting it. Now... regardless of the undeniable fact that... IRaq isn't unfastened top now... and has taken longer to unfastened this united states of america than anticpated. This... ability rebuilding this united states of america will take lots longer. Time is money.... and if money isn't circulating because of the uprise in Iraq. Then... there are not any salary.

2016-11-23 14:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There was a strategy to bomb and destroy everything except oil. The oil was to be stolen. Beyond this there was no strategy.

2007-02-16 19:36:31 · answer #4 · answered by ballanbhira e 2 · 0 1

repeat

2007-02-16 19:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by Carcin Ogin 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers