English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It includes all Light, Anti-Aircraft, Heavy, & Battlecruiser based on three factors

#1. Firepower
#2. Armor
#3. Speed & Range

My EX. UK Leander Class Light Cruiser
#1. 8 X 6in, 4 X 4in, 12 X .5in
#2. Took on Graf Spee and took the 11in guns and only lost the ability to fire its man guns
Armor: 3.5in Belt, 2in Deck, 1in Turret
#3. Max of 32.5 Knots

2007-02-16 12:52:42 · 5 answers · asked by MG 4 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

The DES MOINES CLASS HEAVY CRUISERS
(also called the Salem Class by the less educated)

USS Des Moines CA-134 * USS Salem CA-139 * USS Newport News CA-148

It can be said that with this class the high point and the end of American cruiser development arrived simultaneously. In general terms, these ships had much in common, from an exterior point of view with their Oregon City class predecessors - in the disposition of weaponry and in fire control instruments. This class was the summation of lessons learned in wartime and its ships were (the Alaska class excepted!) the largest cruisers ever built. The fact that they were approximately 4,000 tons heavier than Oregon City stemmed mainly from the introduction of the world's first fully automatic 8" gun turret. These were capable of a rate of fire 20 shells per gun per minute. Obviously a greater quantity of ammunition had to be stowed which meant larger magazines. A further proportion of the additional displacement was devoted to improved armor.
For the first time in heavy cruisers the newly introduced 3in/50's were a standard installation following the experiences of wartime in the Pacific when it was clear that the 2Omm AA was relatively ineffective against Kamikaze aircraft, and that even the 40mm Bofors did not always succeed in preventing such aircraft from reaching their target. To improve the performance of the

5in AA , Ship of the Des Moines Class were given two additional MK 37 control instruments while, for the first time, fire control of the 8" guns was directed by Mk 54.

The 20 mm AA - if ever installed was removed very speedily. Those aircraft catapults that had been installed were removed and the aircraft replaced by helicopters. The after hangar was then used for stowage of ship's boats, the launching and retrieving of which could be carried out by the crane.

With the intention to provide fully-automatic main armament, the Des Moines class shows parallels with th e Worcester class which followed. In 1937 the navy had begun to give the priority to the development of fully automatic twin and triple turrets, and in about 1943 planning began for a cruiser type that would have a main armament of three triple turrets. At that time, development of 8in turrets, able to fire three times as quickly as hitherto available guns, was a breakthrough in gunnery technology. It made the heavy cruiser of much greater value, freeing it as it did from its main drawback - an over-slow rate of fire - a basic reason for the earlier enforced construction of light cruisers with their 6in guns which fired more rapidly. It is interesting to learn that the Oregon City Class with three twin turrets of the new type but the navy was anxious to develop a new design of ship to receive these tun turrets and the idea was dropped in mid- 1943.
The class was to have consisted of at least eight ships. Even after the end of the war the navy wished to complete eight but the growing expectations of the possibilities and effects of guided weapons and cruise missiles made the future of conventional armament problematical. The Korean War, however, had shown that long-range gunnery was of great value in support of troop landings. In this connection the last active ship of the class, Newport News, was in fact used for intensive fire support off the Vietnam coast.
The importance of the class showed itself at the beginning of the 1980s when the Reagan Administration reactivated battleships of the Iowa class. There had been discussion of a possible alternative reactivating of Des Moines (CA-134) and Salem (CA-I39) which had been in reserve. For in the quest for ships with adequate armament and adequate accommodation for a unit staff, and with sufficient deck area to accommodate ship-to-ship missile launchers, the Des Moines class were the only serious candidates. Ultimately a navy study demonstrated that cost effectively, it was more practical to reactivate battleships than the two heavy cruisers.
Only three ships of the Des Moines class were completed. The construction of nine further ships was suspended at the end of the war.

2007-02-16 14:34:50 · answer #1 · answered by Yak Rider 7 · 0 1

In every catagory that would have to be the Baltimore class cruisers. 9 x 8" and 12 x 5" 38 cal DP guns and 24 x 40mm and 22-24x20mm Guns. The armor was ^' on the belt and 2.5" on the deck. *' on the turrets and 6" on the barbettes and Control tower. The ships could go 33+ knots and had huge range for Pacific operations. They also could carry 4 float planes for recon or ultity work like getting the mail. The ships were air conditioned through out and very roomy for the crews. These ships spent most of the time guarding carriers or shelling beaches. This class was so good that some of them lasted into the 1970's as guided missile cruisers and command ships. I would be very confident to take this ship into any battle. I didn't notice the Battle cruiser portion of your question in that case I would Choose the either the Scharnhorst class or Alaska class The Scharnhorst had 9x11" and 12 5.9" guns plus numerous light AA guns The ships armor was massive with a 13" belt and 2.5" decks and 13" turretes and 11" barbettes the ship could move at 32 knots and had 3 float planes but only one catapult. The other was USS ALASKA she would be my personnal favorite as she has 9x12" 50 cal guns that fired a super heavy shell and she also had 12 x5" 38 cal guns plus 56x40mm and 32 x20mm plus 4 float planes with two catapults. The ship could move at 35 knots and had 9" belt armor and a 2" deck armor plus a second armored deck with 3" deck armor. The ship was designed for pacific ocean service and had long range and excellent habitability. The fire control on all the ships I mentiopned here were top notch except Scharnhorst as she didn't have the Radar fire control system of the US which was the best in the world at the time.

2007-02-17 12:44:04 · answer #2 · answered by brian L 6 · 1 0

The IJN Tone class was very good.

Standard Displacement 11,215 tons
Dimension Length: 201.5m
Width: 18.5m
Depth: 6.47m


Main Engine 4 shaft geared turbines
8 boilers
Oil N/A
Horsepower 152,000 shp
Maximum Speed 35kts

Crew 850
Armor Belt 3.9in (machinery)
Deck 2.5 - 1.2in
Turrets 1in
4.9in (magazines)
Armament 8 8in/50 (4x2)
8 5in/40 DP (4x2)
12 25mm AA
12 24in TT (4x3)
Aircraft 6 Aircraft

2007-02-16 21:08:49 · answer #3 · answered by Taba 7 · 0 1

The German battleship Bismarck is one of the most famous warships of the Second World War. Named after the 19th century German chancellor Otto von Bismarck, Bismarck's fame came from the Battle of the Denmark Strait in May 1941 (in which the battlecruiser HMS Hood, flagship and pride of the British Royal Navy, was sunk), from Churchill's subsequent order to "Sink the Bismarck" [1], and from the relentless pursuit by the Royal Navy that ended with her loss only three days later.

The sum of all fears in WWII.

2007-02-16 22:02:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers