you guys think that the bible is the literal word of God , as if other dominations admit that its been altered and edited . so why u do not follow this verse (And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you. (Leviticus 11:7-8)"
and what about this :
1- Did Joshua and the Israelites capture Jerusalem?
Yes (Joshua 10:23, 40)
No (Joshua 15:63)
2- Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary?
Jacob (Matthew 1:16)
Hell (Luke 3:23)
3- Jesus descended from which son of David?
Solomon (Matthew 1:6)
Nathan(Luke3:31)
4- Who was the father of Shealtiel?
Jechoniah (Matthew 1:12)
Neri (Luke 3:27)
5- Which son of Zerubbabel was an ancestor of Jesus Christ?
Abiud (Matthew 1: 13)
Rhesa (Luke 3:27) But the seven sons of Zerubbabel are as follows: i.Meshullam, ii. Hananiah, iii. Hashubah, iv. Ohel, v.Berechiah, vi. Hasad
2007-02-16 10:43:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
they trust Pat Robertson --LOL
2007-02-16 10:50:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I will agree that pigs are unclean. and that eating them is an abomination. The Messiah YAHOSHUA said if you love me keep my commandments John 15:14 Most of your other points are what we call testable nonsense. #1He did capture large parts. Chapter 10 says he nailed the king. Chapter 15 says he failed to exterminate the entire tribe.... not a contradiction at all.
2007-02-16 18:52:02 · answer #2 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is now permissable for Christians to eat those foods,as Peter recieved a vision telling him not to call what the Lord made unclean.
1.
2There is no discrepancy because one genealogy is for Mary and the other is for Joseph. It was customary to mention the genealogy through the father even though it was clearly known that it was through Mary.
3.It is not contradictory.If somone was to write;Serena is a desecendant of Michael,and someone was to write;Serena is a decesecndant of Paul,it would not be contradictory if Paul was Michaels deseccendant or vice-versa.
4.More geanology.Refer to #3
5.Refer to #3
2007-02-16 19:10:48 · answer #3 · answered by Serena 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do you ask the questions when you really don't want any answers? I'm sure those questions arose during "your own personal" study right? Those a tired old "talking points" that have been addressed a million times. They all have logical answers...if you were really serious about finding them.
Obviously, you are free to throw all the dirt you want. My only question is: why do you want to trash something you don't understand?
2007-02-16 18:57:58 · answer #4 · answered by Seven 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evangelical means, never-mind. We were released from the old law whenever Jesus came back unless your Jewish. I am an evangelical Presbyterian and am eating cow right now and gonna have some pig in the morning.
2007-02-16 18:52:52 · answer #5 · answered by Litldragon67 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Prince of Egypt probably was taught these laws. They do protect health. Congratulations on reading the Bible.
2007-02-16 18:59:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you really know what you are reading? Do you understand it? First off, New Covenant under the grace of Jesus Christ--we are no longer under the law, but under His grace. The law has not been removed, but we are under the grace of God.
And as far as those other scriptures, I do not think you understand them.
2007-02-16 18:53:21 · answer #7 · answered by Mandolyn Monkey Munch 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You study it yourself, and find out the answers. I'm not going to indulge, but ther are straight answers to your questions, you have to think about it, friend.
2007-02-16 19:05:40 · answer #8 · answered by bbjones9 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Still waiting for the question...or did you answer them all? Bad boy. You are not very social.
2007-02-16 18:52:11 · answer #9 · answered by Fatima 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
cuz Im not Jewish....those things were required thousands of years ago....the Lord died since then HE WAS THE SACRIFICE THAT REPLACES all those laws that we dont need except ten commands
2007-02-16 18:51:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋