Police officers or former police: When you decide to pull someone over for speeding, do you...?

Question

stop the car going the fastest, out ahead of the pack, or the car going the slowest, nearest to you? I've always heard: "You can't catch 'em all!"

Answer 1

I always try to stop the car going the fastest ahead of the pack. It's kinda like fishing. You can't catch them all, but you always try for the biggest. In this case the fastest.

I have even gone so far as to tell the speeder that they have won the race and here (Hand them the ticket) is proof to your friends. :)

Answer 2

The officer must first make an observation that a suspect vehicle is speeding and appears to be out front - by itself and pulling away from all existing traffic. The radar is then used to verify his observations. The officer then pursues and stops the violator. Because everyone speeds - Our traffic division did not stop anyone unless they were going 15 MPH over the speed limit.

Answer 3

I took several items into consideration before making that judgement, my thing that I would look for would be, is this a solid case, as in how was the speed and such determined, and also, you want to go after the person that you might get more out of the vehicle stop. Such as you are going to go after the younger driver than some old person, as you might be able to find somebody with warrants or are more likely to have narcotics or paraphernalia in the vehicle.

Answer 4

in case you defined the region wisely, then he became into no longer pulled over for a velocity proper violation. Why became into this automobile utilising his brake greater desirable than others? Wasn't this automobile no longer only like the others? do no longer you think of it warrants added study? You mentioned that it became into at evening. possibly the Officer suspected that the driving force became into ingesting. there is justification for the provide up of issues which you pronounced -- place, time, unusual (no longer only like the others). there is violations that solidifies the officer's reason to provide up him -- incorrect mild, previous historic previous, and so on. only because of the fact he have been given stopped does no longer mean that he have been given a cost tag. I truthfully have stopped human beings for weaving around the lines on the line. Upon the provide up, i got here across that they've been drained, and not inebriated. I direct them to a hotel or relax section and asked that they get some relax in the past getting lower back on the line.

Answer 5

I was in Nashville, TN in 1976, speeding 80-something down I-40 with about a hundred other cars. A cop came up behind me with the blues on. When I pulled over to get out of his way, he pulled in behind me and wrote me up. I asked him, "Why me, when there were a hundred other cars speeding,too?". The cop looked at me and said, "Well, you stopped.". I've laughed about that for years, although it didn't feel funny at the time.

Answer 6

I stop the one who is speeding. He/she has caught my attention by not driving with the flow of traffic, I've measured their speed with a radar, then I stop them for the infraction. No consideration is given to anything other than the infraction.

Answer 7

You catch the one you track, radar is all part of a system, an officer will be picking out the car as part of the system to radar.

Answer 8

No, Because I was an officier with athority but now I quit ny job and became a chef.

Answer 9

I always pulled over the one I was sure violated the law. Didn't matter if they were fast, slow, male, female, black, white, etc.