The US has found American-made weapons in Iraq; should the US invade the US?

Answer 1

Anyone else think this guy is like the comedian Gallagher, smashing the same stupid watermelon over and over and thinking it's funny every time???

Oh, but wait, this time he's smashing a pumpkin! Oh the riotous guffawing.

Answer 2

Yes. We should invade congress and fire every last one of those over-paid fucksticks. We should throw them out on the street and try them all for treason and crimes against humanity.

Then, we should take away every last ammendment to the constitution that has been made in the last 40 years.

Then we should hold elections that DO NOT allow anyone who is wealthy to run as a candidate. Corporate sponsorship of candidates will not be allowed or tolerated. A flat-tax immediately imposed where everyone pays the same 4-7% whatever with NO POSSIBILITY for deductions. You pay the **** regardless.

We would have the debt paid off and re-establish ourselves among other world powers in a matter of minutes once we rid our government of the money-grubbing fat cats that are currently in charge of making themselves more wealthy while destroying everything this country was founded on.

Answer 3

The foreign policy of the Bush Administration is, to put it mildly, wild, weird and wacky.

That the hawks are focused on Iran is undeniable, trying the same old trick to build up a strong case against Iran to later justify whatever actions it deems politically and economically advantageous.

Iraq was stubbornly linked to 9/11, was accused of having WMD and of course training terrorists and providing sanctuary for them, all threatening the security of the USA. These spurious reasons justified an invasion whose victory however, became pyrrhic at best.

To simply accuse Iran of providing weapons and therefore increasing the effectiveness of the insurgents can only convince simpletons and the gullibles.

In a war, weapons are procured from anywhere and everwhere. This is also the reason why all weapons manufacturers dearly welcome armed conflicts, big and small, for the business they generate. Mind you, in this, the USA is the world's biggest and most active weapons purveyor and all purchasers are welcome.

Alongside America, one should also find Russia, China, Britain, France and a host of other nations all vying for the lucrative business of weaponry supplies. To this long list one can of course, even include Israel. Business men recognise only money and it is no concern to them who wins or loses in an armed conflict. It is thus easy to understand the power of the American military-industrial complex.

If by virtue of the fact that Iranian weaponry or the remnants thereof, are found and therefore reasons enough to punish that country, then I totally agree that Bush should unleash his armed forces on his own country. Better still, use his huge arsenal of atomic weapons on America itself. Iranian weapons have no business to be in Iraq. But there are far more weapons of US origins in the hands of insurgents than weapons from any other country.

While Bush is going against his own country, American should also mount operations against all the other countries, starting with those neighbouring Iraq, notably, Saudi Arabia (supplying American-made), Turkey and of course, Israel, close allies be damned as these countries are all cranks and crazies.

In short, America should take on virtually the whole world simply because all kinds of weapons could trace their origins to so many regions and countries.

About time Bush and his hawks woke up from their drunk pursuit
of regionalising the armed conflict. America has already lost in Iraq while Afghanistan is slowly but surely reverting back to the al-Qaeda regime.

Better for the US to accept the whol misadventure Mission Lost", withdraw, nurse its wounded ego and hope that the people of the country invaded could forgive and forget and not really bring vengeful terrorist actions onto American shores.

Answer 4

for sure u . s . of america ought to no longer invade France because French guns were found in Iraq. If international locations depending invasions on manufacturers of guns the completed international would oftentimes combating one yet another and we will be living in a state of global conflict each and each and every of the time.

Answer 5

How about this, genius. There are American made weapons in virtually every country on earth. There are also Soviet and China made weapons in virtually every country in the world. What's your point, pinhead?

Answer 6

You loser.Atleast have the imagination to think up your own questions.
This same question was on an episode of Daily update with Jon Stewart.Word for word.

Answer 7

Most weapons around the world used against our troops are Soviet made. Can you say AK-47????

Answer 8

No, that would lead to negative repercussions for the people responsible. How about instead, the conservatives call you a troll and a terrorist and a terrorist supporter. It makes it a lot easier for everybody.

Answer 9

Absolutely!

After all Bush - the Village Idiot did say publically that any one assisting the terrorists should be also treated like a Terrorist!

The United States - Thanks to the warmongering Republicans are the Worlds largest manufacturer and exporter of Arms and Amunition!

I suggest we change our Motto from "IN GOD WE TRUST" - to a more realistic one like - 'WE KILL PEOPLE - THAT'S OUR JOB"!

Answer 10

Well. seems how we sold our WEAPONS to them in 1989 there should still be plenty of weapons ffrom the us over there.