The US has found French-made weapons in Iraq; should they invade France?

Answer 1

LOL. I hear there are U.S. weapons in Iraq too, left over from when we put Hussein into power in the '80s. Should we attack ourselves? Oh, I think we already have.

Remember "freedom fries"? That's American logic for you.

Answer 2

Of course America should not invade France because French weapons were found in Iraq. If countries based invasions on producers of weapons the whole world would constantly fighting each other and we would be living in a state of world war all the time.

Answer 3

This question is "old news". The primary reasons that France & Germany didn't sign-up early on for the Iraqi initiave, was because they were both doing significant business with Saddam and his cut-throat, chop-your-headoff, gas-you, regieme. Both countries have deteriorated to a level of "what brings in a buck". - And these are our "allies"?

There is no reason to invade France. In World War II, the German's didn't have to invade France - They just had to show up. -- You do know that the Nazi's marched through the "Arch 'de Triumph" without a shot, don't you?

The bottom-line in your question is should the U.S. invade France - there is no reason to - They will side with the "winners", regardless of who it is, and brag about how their ancesters were all part of the "French Underground".

-- And let's not forget that several other weapons where from the Soviets, Iran and the UNITED STATES!

Answer 4

There are also american made weapons in Iraq. If you recall we sold them a bunch of weapons back during the Reagan administration. Did I miss something? Did the US invade Iran?

Answer 5

There are also US made weapons in both Iran and Iraq should we invade the US?

Answer 6

No more than us British should have invaded France because of the French jets the Argies had

Answer 7

I bet the US also found US-made weapons in Iraq. Should we also invade ourselves? Oh, no! We no longer have a fallout shelter.

Answer 8

only if the french are giveing them weapons right now. we even gave iraq weapons in the 80s should we invade oursleves?

Answer 9

The hard part will be when we have to invade ourselves for the American-made weapons being used against us by the Taliban....

Answer 10

-concerning his ego, he for sure did not imagine it would finally end up to be the morass it has grow to be. that is because of the administration's utter failure to comprehend what they were transferring into, and plan to that end. He assumed it may well be a short, decisive victory, with a more beneficial advantageous effect than his dad's conflict, which may deliver about a good higher score. -i'm no longer particular what you advise once you aspect out being money hungry. once you're concerning his wanting to open up Iraqi oil bypass again, the administration really suggested as a lot at the same time as they informed us that Iraqi oil would pay for the militia marketing campaign. As to learn causes previous that, inspect what Haliburton's been raking in. -with regard to the mythical WMD's, once again he imagined a short and entire victory, and then no one would have even concept to educate the shortcoming of WMD's. regrettably for him, the conflict dragged out, and persons realized that the excuses given for it in the first position were unfaithful. You did not even aspect out that he had expressed a want to eliminate Saddam, because he tried to kill his father. Or that in the months optimum as a lot as 9/11, he suggested Iraq over one hundred situations in speeches(as hostile to Bin weighted down once, i trust). ok, there we bypass. impressive, trouble-free, logical refutations of your factors. i'm particular you'll discover some thanks to disagree, yet your conflict of words ought to in trouble-free terms, at this aspect, be in accordance to repeating neocon talking factors and White domicile press releases.