The US has found Chinese-made weapons in Iraq; should we invade China?

Answer 1

The US Military is fed by China. The US government machinery is run by Chinese money.

It is a shame but it is the truth. And therefore, you can't bite the hand that feeds you. not only will you not get fed, but a slap in the butt as well.

Answer 2

because the united states did not "illegally invade oil-wealthy Iraq," i'd ought to assert that no, it isn't hypocrisy; you basically do not comprehend the topic matters in contact. First, there is more beneficial oil under Alaska or in the Dakotas than in each and each and every of the middle East blended, yet you libbies refuse to let them to drill for it even besides the undeniable fact that, a minimum of in Alaska, they overwhelmingly prefer to do it. second, as we've informed you in the previous many situations, there grow to be very a lot of credible data to point that there have been WMDs in Iraq that is why people like Hillary voted to bypass into Iraq because the President has no authority to take action on his personal. So, you libbies brazenly debated this for weeks, if no longer months, allowing Saddam to get any data of WMDs into Iran, it is the position maximum of them at the instantaneous are. except for, regardless of if there have been not any WMDs as you insist, Iraq breached maximum, if no longer each and each and every of the agreements that deliver about an end of desolate tract hurricane. One grow to be sufficient to bypass again in and take Baghdad. Thirdly, i come upon it quite telling that you help the troublesome crackdown on the Tibetans who in trouble-free terms prefer to be free and self sufficient. in case you pollthe Iraqis, maximum are satisfied that the U. S. is there and do not want them to go away fairly yet. i don't think of you'll get an similar numbers in Tibet. Tibet proclaimed its independence from China in 1911. Tibet remained an self sufficient state till presently after the top of the chinese civil conflict, at the same time as on October a million, 1949, the persons's Republic of China grow to be formally proclaimed in Beijing and the following 3 hundred and sixty 5 days released an armed invasion of Tibet. The chinese military of 40,000 adult men routed the unprepared protecting Tibetan military of in trouble-free terms 5,000. So, you've a issue with the U. S. "invading" Iraq as you declare, yet you do not have a issue with China invading and annexing Tibet. who's the hypocrite the following?

Answer 3

Since we armed Saddam and funded his rise to power back in the 80's (in the Iran/Iraq war), there are probably a lot of American weapons in Iraq. Should we invade ourselves?

Answer 4

Good point. With the administration's theory, we should invade any country that makes weapons found in Iraq. This is just a spin on the obvious WMD lie.

Answer 5

Oh, what a wonderful idea. Let's have even more wars, and kill more people. Oh yes, that would be lovely. History repeats itself. How many people must die for the governments and the countries to learn from their mistakes?!

Answer 6

Chinese bought the technology from Russia. So, why don't we invade Russia, just to get to the root of the problem?

Answer 7

Sure. Why not invade all countries of the world ?! isn`t it exciting ? (*just beeing cinical)

Answer 8

get a life

Answer 9

what would be the benefit? more death? more families torn apart by war? what's the point? oh yes. how could i forget? it would make all the war-mongers (our president?) happy.

Answer 10

It's only a matter of time.