English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I think by having the jab full stop proves risky, same amount of chemicals in a single dose as there is in three separate doses. I think that the risk is the same. Its a choice a parent should make for themselves and their child.

2007-02-16 09:00:51 · answer #1 · answered by Lisa P 5 · 1 0

i would say all in cos then its done with and you can then just carry on has normal i wouldn't listen to everything the papers say
but on the other hand if you have the money and you have doubts about the all in one then take the three separate ones either way you will only do what you think is right

2007-02-16 17:05:56 · answer #2 · answered by rob 3 · 1 0

Think twice about it. Have you noticed top politicians will not confirm or deny that their children have had it, they haven't. That's because it now contains a drop of mercury, it will not kill or make the child ill but it shorts out the nerve connections and makes them into zombies that will believe and obey the government whatever.
I know, you don't believe me, then why are children leaving school illiterate. Think about it.

2007-02-16 17:09:06 · answer #3 · answered by tucksie 6 · 1 0

There's no such thing as the MRI Jab. MRI Scan - yes. MRI Jab - no.

2007-02-16 17:03:44 · answer #4 · answered by Away With The Fairies 7 · 0 0

it's the mmr, and all of our kids(5) had it with no adverse affects whatsoever.

2007-02-16 17:08:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

er, its MMR measles mumps and rubella.

MRI is a magnetic resonance inferometer... or body scanner...

2007-02-16 17:01:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers