Way to go. We were already having a secret war on spam. Now that you've made it public, the Democrats are going to form committees and spend bazillions of dollars producing non-binding memos about showing love to spammers, that spammers are people too, that there's no real evidence of nuclear powered weapons of spam destruction, that we need to give proper notice to spammers before reporting them. Just when we started making progress too.....
2007-02-16 08:54:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by teran_realtor 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Put a little brown sugar and pineapple on it mmmm good!
Is it possible to fight spam? Probably not. Just use your spam blocker and hope for the best. The guys that create that stuff are usually a half a step ahead of the ones creating the blocking software.
2007-02-16 16:32:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we should, it's attacking our inboxes. E-mail sites like Yahoo and Hotmail should make companies pay for the privilege of spamming, like, say, a dollar per every e-mail account with them. By hitting them in the wallet, we can make companies realize that spam advertising isn't very cost effective.
2007-02-16 16:46:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by tkron31 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
we will win in iraq long befor we win the war on spam
2007-02-16 17:10:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Dept of Commerce has already made several pre-emptive strikes.
2007-02-16 16:31:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's liberate Canada first.
2007-02-16 16:36:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
large ill tempered men heavily armed ought to break down their doors and beat them to a fgriggen pulp with their own equipment then they ought to publish their personal info on the net
2007-02-16 16:31:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The meat product? I think it goes well with scrambled eggs myself.
2007-02-16 20:19:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
let Dumbya use the fictions WMDs on spam!
2007-02-16 16:31:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by null 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
meat should not have a gelatinous layer-ewwww
2007-02-17 03:16:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by pele 4
·
0⤊
1⤋