English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-16 07:57:58 · 8 answers · asked by gotagetaweigh 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Please note anarchy means lack of AUTHORITY and GOVERMENT, does not mean a lack of rules or organization. A group without a leader can intentionally or unintentionally agree upon a set of rules of what to do and not to do. Manner and etiquette are primes examples of this, for these exist when authority exists or is lacking. Food not Bombs is an example of an organized anarchy group, therefore an organized group based on anarchy ideals is not impossible. In fact direct democracy that came frome ancient Athens is a form of organized anarchy in govermental form.

2007-02-16 08:26:56 · update #1

8 answers

Beautiful oxymoronic thought.
Keep challenging people.
That is how to overthrow this insipid dogmatic lack-of-thought called faith.

2007-02-16 08:04:18 · answer #1 · answered by starryeyed 6 · 0 0

You can't. Organization implies rules. Anarchy is the absence of rules.

2007-02-16 16:02:10 · answer #2 · answered by Purdey EP 7 · 0 0

Wouldn't that be inherently impossible; an ORGANIZED anarchy? Um, I suppose here's to hoping though.

2007-02-16 16:01:45 · answer #3 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0 0

Hence the duality of spirituality and religion as defined by Hegel. That might have been the only part of Hegel I understood.

2007-02-16 16:00:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that was done in 1939 to 45

2007-02-16 16:04:37 · answer #5 · answered by andrew w 7 · 0 0

It's been done. You're looking at it. The real thing is another story.

2007-02-16 16:01:06 · answer #6 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0 0

Just jump right in there if you are feeling froggy. Let me know how it turns out.

2007-02-16 16:00:23 · answer #7 · answered by regmor12 3 · 0 0

sounds like marx

2007-02-16 16:00:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers